Teams

Refunds

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · Refunds

22 players · average NTRP 3.18 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Megan Gilson
published
3.71
Joseph Cochran
published
3.54
Adam Webb
published 3.5
3.43
Deborah Toomey
published 3.5
3.39
Erin Overcash
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Myles Bell
published
3.33
Melissa Barhorst
published 3.5
3.03
Sonia Hassani
published 3.5
3.02
Lori Holcombe
published
3.00
Zahide Marenic
published 3
2.99
Kimberly Fore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Nicole Morgan
published
2.82
Traci Prieto
published
2.71
Melissa Moloney
published 3
2.71
Reshmi Santhosh
published
2.56
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.42
Antoinette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.35
Rachel Bardin
published
2.31
Margaret Harding
published
2.17
Trish Wilbur
published
2.13
Leslee Black
published 2.5
Kristen Hilty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslee Black + Margaret Harding3346% games+1.7% vs expected
Sonia Hassani + Erin Overcash2352% gamesnot enough data
Traci Prieto + Erin Overcash314 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Hassani + Kimberly Fore314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Fore + Melissa Barhorst033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Gilson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.86
Joseph Cochran
44W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
3.5
Adam Webb
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Deborah Toomey
125W–65L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Erin Overcash
134W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Myles Bell
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
3.5
Melissa Barhorst
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Sonia Hassani
41W–51L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Lori Holcombe
34W–50L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Zahide Marenic
56W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3.5
Kimberly Fore
72W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Nicole Morgan
15W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Traci Prieto
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Melissa Moloney
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Reshmi Santhosh
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
23W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
3
Antoinette Tan
69W–117L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Rachel Bardin
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Margaret Harding
8W–21L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Trish Wilbur
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Leslee Black
38W–63L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Kristen Hilty
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.