Teams

BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sonia Whitfield
published
3.37
Elaine Roe
published 3.5
3.34
Haewon Kwon
published 3.5
3.33
Christine Fronczak
published 3.5
3.33
Katherine Sandell
published
3.29
Carolyn Booker
published 3.5
Erinn O'Reilly
published 3.5
3.19
3.15
Rae Chiang
published
3.12
Nelly Eunhee Park
published
3.11
Vera Parengkuan
published
3.05
Shawna Ballard
published
2.90
Catherine Nadeau
published 3.5
2.85
Hayley Charnaw
published 3
2.82
Leticia Lafosse
published
2.82
Nancy Pizzo
published
2.82
Marie Iverson
published
2.76
Cindy Motamedi
published 3
2.74
Sarah Arjomand
published
2.66
Noriko Sekikawa
published
2.61
Hoai Cao
published 3
Katherine Lederer
published
Katrina Heiles
published
Song Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dao-Makiyama + Vera Parengkuan4148% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Booker + Elaine Roe134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pizzo + Noriko Sekikawa033 matchesnot enough data
Leticia Lafosse + Cindy Motamedi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonia Whitfield
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Elaine Roe
21W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Haewon Kwon
44W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Christine Fronczak
50W–39L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Katherine Sandell
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Carolyn Booker
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Erinn O'Reilly
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Theresa Dao-Makiyama
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Rae Chiang
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Nelly Eunhee Park
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
Vera Parengkuan
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Shawna Ballard
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Catherine Nadeau
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Hayley Charnaw
23W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
Leticia Lafosse
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Nancy Pizzo
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.82
Marie Iverson
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cindy Motamedi
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
Sarah Arjomand
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Noriko Sekikawa
5W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Hoai Cao
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.61
Katherine Lederer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katrina Heiles
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Song Kim
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.