Teams

Anderson - 4.0

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-11vs Magistad: Tennis not PickleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDaniel Handeen / Edward Lee vs Luke Jordan / Jeff Nelson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTyler Johnson / Arnold Ringstad vs Michael Jahnl / Fernando Flores6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJoseph McGonigle vs Mark Magistad6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLuke Anderson / Benjamin Hood vs Anthony Magistad / Edwin Hodder6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesWill Holcomb / Joseph McGonigle vs Thomas C Anderson / Ramji Kamakoti2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDaniel Handeen vs Matt Lechevin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Albu / Benjamin Hood vs Ian Gideon / Jakob Strawhecker4-6, 3-6
2025-02-25vs Tuplano/Ostlund TBC v2 18+ 4.0 W25Lost 14
L#1 DoublesJoseph McGonigle / Will Holcomb vs Kailash Kalyanasundaram / Kaushal Kalyanasundaram2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDaniel Handeen vs Guang Yang3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLuke Anderson / Sairam Sunkam vs Matt Woelfel / Liam Gillespie6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRyan Albu vs Ronnie Payne1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Hood / Tyler Johnson vs Austin Choe / Alex Chou2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Handeen / Edward Lee vs Jason Bednar / Hui Huang4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph McGonigle vs Ryan Curtin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWill Holcomb / Sairam Sunkam vs Matthew Sobieski / Bowen CAI6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRyan Albu vs Yue Zheng6-2, 6-1
2025-02-11vs Shaughnessy Ball SmashersLost 04
L#1 DoublesWill Holcomb / Sairam Sunkam vs Nathaniel Kline / Cameron Sloan3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph McGonigle vs Wyatt Sherwood7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Handeen / Shubham Gupta vs Noah Farber / Noah Lipschultz4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Albu / Benjamin Hood vs Ryan Cuellar / Noah Thacker4-6, 2-6
2025-01-21vs Magistad: Tennis not PickleLost 14
L#1 DoublesRichard Dillman / Tyler Johnson vs Jay Knutson / Mark Magistad6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph McGonigle vs Luke Jordan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuke Anderson / Jordan Randall vs Scott Birkeland / Jeff Nelson2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Handeen vs Michael Jahnl6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEdward Lee / Benjamin Hood vs Trevis Herrmann / Michael Magistad3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDaniel Handeen / Sairam Sunkam vs Jakob Strawhecker / John Simon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWill Holcomb vs Matt Lechevin0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Randall / Edward Lee vs Chris Schlichting / Craig Ballentine4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRyan Albu vs Daniel Brown3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesArnold Ringstad / Shubham Gupta vs Kevin Madugula / Chandha Duwearatchi3-6, 4-6
2025-01-07vs Tuplano/Ostlund TBC v2 18+ 4.0 W25Lost 12
W#1 DoublesWill Holcomb / Joseph McGonigle vs Kailash Kalyanasundaram / Kaushal Kalyanasundaram6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRichard Dillman vs Guang Yang4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Hood / Sairam Sunkam vs Per Ostlund / Ronnie Payne3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Will Holcomb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.85
Daniel Handeen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.63
Joseph McGonigle
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.62
Ryan Albu
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.44
Arnold Ringstad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Benjamin Hood
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Jordan Randall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Dillman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sairam Sunkam
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Holcomb + Joseph McGonigle134 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Hood + Ryan Albu134 matchesnot enough data
Will Holcomb + Ryan Albu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Will Holcomb
46W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Daniel Handeen
12W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
Joseph McGonigle
5W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Ryan Albu
19W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Arnold Ringstad
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Benjamin Hood
4W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Randall
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Dillman
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sairam Sunkam
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.