Teams

Thoma/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-27vs Atkins/White/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmanda Morgan / Tiffany Bard vs Sara White / Romina Graham3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesColleen Bracken vs Margaret Gorzny0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHays Estes / Nicky Nash vs Caroline Royalty / Meredith Garrett4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Landman / Christin Spender vs Tara Platt / Christine Holz3-6, 0-6
2026-04-01vs Burke/Wright/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesArnita Ozgener / Heather Cooley vs Helen Hopson / Caroline Bailey2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChristin Spender vs Nikki Turitto0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNicky Nash / Jennifer Baker vs Catherine Pattison / Hannah Wright2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKim Thoma vs Alise Gregory1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn McNabb / Colleen Bracken vs Libby Burke / Elizabeth Green1-6, 2-6
2026-03-30vs Messer/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesArnita Ozgener / Emily Johnson vs Beth Burns / Jennifer Trevino2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmanda Morgan vs Cornelia Vance3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicky Nash / Christin Spender vs Rebecca Moriarity / Tasha Freels2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHays Estes vs Tonya Messer1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVirginia Seibels / Jennifer Baker vs Shannon Sanford / Ann Weggeman4-6, 4-6
2026-03-02vs Myers/Ivey/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Baker / Kim Thoma vs Katie Myers / Lisa Thompson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesColleen Bracken vs Jamie Boyd6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Morgan / Tiffany Bard vs Darby Walden / Rachel Stovall7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJaqueline Brock / Hays Estes vs Geralyn Applegate / Paige Glendinning7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Jaqueline Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Courtney Irving
published 3
2.85
Sue Groomes
published
2.83
Hays Estes
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Amanda Morgan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Arnita Ozgener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Tiffany Bard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Kim Thoma
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Colleen Bracken
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Kathryn McNabb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Heather Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Lindsay Landman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Nicky Nash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Marianne Huddle
published
2.37
Virginia Seibels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Christin Spender
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christin Spender + Nicky Nash033 matchesnot enough data
Hays Estes + Lindsay Landman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaqueline Brock
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.14
3
Courtney Irving
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Sue Groomes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.85
Hays Estes
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Amanda Morgan
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Arnita Ozgener
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Tiffany Bard
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Kim Thoma
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Colleen Bracken
2W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Kathryn McNabb
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Heather Cooley
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lindsay Landman
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Nicky Nash
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
Marianne Huddle
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Virginia Seibels
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Christin Spender
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.