Teams

Thomas

2025 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-29vs TettehLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeclan Harrison / Marla LaHaye vs Carolina Villegas / Byron Levy1-6, 2-6
2025-03-23vs TettehLost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Dovel / Maureen Dupcak vs Alison Bailey / Leonard Tetteh2-6, 5-7
2025-03-16vs TettehLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeslie Baird / Declan Harrison vs Eve Helmer / Alan Chaney4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarla LaHaye / Dejuan Mcilwain vs Adam Thomasson / Christen Harsha4-6, 2-6
2025-02-16vs TettehWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaureen Dupcak / Kelson Weber vs Eve Helmer / Adam Thomasson7-6, 5-4
2025-02-09vs TettehLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Dupcak / Kelson Weber vs Leonard Tetteh / Leah Noonan3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTatiana Loboda / Dejuan Mcilwain vs Luis Lozano / Alison Bailey1-6, 1-6
2025-01-11vs TettehSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJordan Dovel / Tatiana Loboda vs Alan Chaney / Eve Helmer3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSamuel Hughes / Leslie Baird vs Simone Feldman / Leonard Tetteh7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2025-01-05vs TettehLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexander Thomas / Maureen Dupcak vs Simone Feldman / Luis Lozano4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarla LaHaye / Samuel Hughes vs Christen Harsha / Alan Chaney1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Maureen Dupcak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Jordan Dovel
published
Dejuan Mcilwain
published 4.5
4.25
Leslie Baird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Declan Harrison
published 4.5
4.16
Sue Fisher
published
4.15
Alexander Thomas
published 4
4.05
Tatiana Loboda
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Marla LaHaye
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.73
Samuel Hughes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maureen Dupcak
103W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
Jordan Dovel
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Dejuan Mcilwain
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Leslie Baird
71W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Declan Harrison
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Sue Fisher
23W–27L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Alexander Thomas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.15
4.5
Tatiana Loboda
178W–130L career · 9 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Marla LaHaye
63W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
Samuel Hughes
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.