Teams

Yates - Pinehurst #9

2026 Sandhills Adult 55 & over · 3.0 Senior Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-06vs Haugh -Highland Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Louise Lucas vs Laurie Cherry / Eydie Hammaker6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Maloney / Sondra Montesi Yates vs Sharon Williford / Denise O'Dell6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGaye Saunders / Leah Bradley vs Susan Miller / Martha Lerario2-6, 5-7
2026-04-22vs Lesniak - Gates FourWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Louise Lucas vs Sarah Hallock / Angela Daniel6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberly Maloney / Kelly Rader vs Mari Lesniak / Peggy Schaefer6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngie Simmons / Vilma Mendez vs Betty Peterson / Theresa Jones2-6, 5-7
2026-04-15vs Haugh -Highland Country ClubWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Louise Lucas vs Mary Haugh / Denise O'Dell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeah Bradley / Kelly Rader vs Sharon Williford / Susan Miller6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Maloney / Sondra Montesi Yates vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-01vs Lesniak - Gates FourWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Maloney / Susan Lindamood vs Gwenda Combs / Donna Pope6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAngie Simmons / Jamie Moss vs Betty Peterson / Theresa Jones6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesVilma Mendez / Leah Bradley vs Mari Lesniak / Sue Ann Hall4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-25vs Haugh -Highland Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesVilma Mendez / Angie Simmons vs Murtis Worth / Lauren Blashford1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss vs Laurie Cherry / Denise O'Dell0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Louise Lucas vs Mary Haugh / Martha Lerario6-3, 7-5
2026-03-11vs Lesniak - Gates FourLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Moss / Gaye Saunders vs Sarah Hallock / Angela Daniel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSondra Montesi Yates / Tina Oakley vs Theresa Jones / Gwenda Combs1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Leah Bradley vs Betty Peterson / Jacqui Cannon3-6, 6-7
2026-03-04vs Haugh -Highland Country ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Moss / Gaye Saunders vs Corinna Williamson / Tammy Keller3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Bradley / Kimberly Maloney vs Denise O'Dell / Murtis Worth1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVilma Mendez / Angie Simmons vs Virginia Forbis / Lisa Cook2-6, 2-6
2026-02-25vs Lesniak - Gates FourLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Maloney / Tina Oakley vs Sarah Hallock / Amy Bradley3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Lindamood / Lynne Beechler vs Theresa Jones / Angela Daniel6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVilma Mendez / Angie Simmons vs Betty Peterson / Jacqui Cannon4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Senior Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Haugh -Highland Country Club7118612155
2Yates - Pinehurst #935111327218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Lynne Beechler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Sondra Montesi Yates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Kelly Rader
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Louise Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Tina Oakley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Jamie Moss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Gaye Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Leah Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
Susan Lindamood
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.39
Vilma Mendez
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.37
Kimberly Maloney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Moss + Sondra Montesi Yates101446% games+5.3% vs expected
Louise Lucas + Susan Lindamood314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Beechler
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Sondra Montesi Yates
43W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kelly Rader
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Louise Lucas
8W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Tina Oakley
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Jamie Moss
34W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Gaye Saunders
11W–37L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Leah Bradley
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Susan Lindamood
17W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
Vilma Mendez
3W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39
Kimberly Maloney
11W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.