Teams

Jirjis/Hayes

2025 Mixed 55 & Over- Murfreesboro · 4.0 Mixed 55 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-28vs Wishing/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Knapp / Yale Riley vs Carl Ragland / Karen Corn4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Doulin / Ray Brown vs Frank Drowota / Brenda Monajjem7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhilip Markuson / Donna Leedle vs Jennifer Kelley / Oliver Owens6-7, 2-6
2025-07-26vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesYale Riley / Christine Cowan vs Thomas Goodwyn / Sally Wrather2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRandall Malchow / Cindy Knapp vs Oliver Owens / Joy Owens4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlbert Whitson / Kathleen Doulin vs Anselm Wishing / Jennifer Kelley6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-22vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Smith / Ann Frantz vs Frank Drowota / Collier Andress Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Leedle / Eric Howser vs John Kinard / Jennifer Kelley5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Jirjis / Daniel Hayes vs Sally Wrather / Thomas Goodwyn2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-29vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Mccullough / Randall Malchow vs Karen Corn / T Scott Baker7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Cowan / Yale Riley vs Frank Drowota / Collier Andress Smith3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnn Frantz / Ray Brown vs Carl Ragland / Brenda Monajjem4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-28vs Wishing/MurfreesboroWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteve Smith / Robin Gilliam vs Joy Owens / Oliver Owens2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCindy Mccullough / Daniel Hayes vs John Kinard / Jennifer Kelley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Frantz / Bill BALDI vs T Scott Baker / Karen Corn7-6, 6-3
2025-06-24vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 12
W#1 DoublesBill BALDI / Tammy Jirjis vs Carl Ragland / Jennifer Kelley6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEric Howser / Donna Leedle vs Frank Drowota / Collier Andress Smith7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlbert Whitson / Kathleen Doulin vs Thomas Goodwyn / Sally Wrather5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Mixed 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jirjis/Hayes2461229204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Philip Markuson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Tammy Jirjis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Daniel Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Donna Leedle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Christine Cowan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Cindy Mccullough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Robin Gilliam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Yale Riley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Ray Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Cindy Knapp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Kathleen Doulin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Bill BALDI
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Albert Whitson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Ann Frantz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Eric Howser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Randall Malchow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Howser + Donna Leedle5550% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cowan + Yale Riley0738% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Markuson
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Tammy Jirjis
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Daniel Hayes
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Donna Leedle
28W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christine Cowan
0W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Cindy Mccullough
56W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Robin Gilliam
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
Yale Riley
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Ray Brown
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cindy Knapp
38W–23L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Kathleen Doulin
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Bill BALDI
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Albert Whitson
18W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Ann Frantz
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Eric Howser
13W–7L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Randall Malchow
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.