Teams

A18 3.5W GR Tremmel

2022 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-14vs A18 3.5W TP2 LutzLost 23
L#1 DoublesDonna Tremmel / Sharon Robinson vs Erin Gray / Erin Baginski0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Peel vs Julie Trende2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Adkins / Vivette Saccone vs Gail Wilkes / Terri Conner6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesAshley Bullach vs Brooke Kaylor0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Ross / Tara Bowers vs Lisa Lutz / Kristi Schulte6-3, 7-6
2022-07-07vs A18 3.5W AS WimerWon 40
W#1 DoublesVivette Saccone / Susan Adkins vs Kathy Stitzlein / Brandi Wimer7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCindy Gamby vs Holly Ballard6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarlene Pisanelli / Patricia Johnson vs Melinda Thomas / Bethany Nussbaum6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStephanie Houston vs Stephanie Noble6-2, 6-2
2022-06-30vs A18 3.5W BR LaveryWon 31
W#1 DoublesVivette Saccone / Susan Adkins vs Sally Lavery / Sarah Johnson6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichelle Ross vs Molly Wachter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Bullach / Tara Bowers vs Rachel Brahler / Angela Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStephanie Houston vs Rita Demarco6-1, 3-0
2022-06-16vs A18 3.5W NC McHolmLost 23
L#1 DoublesVivette Saccone / Susan Adkins vs Heather Bundschuh / Stephanie Kurtz4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCindy Gamby vs Jaimie Crumbley6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Robinson / Tara Bowers vs Jane Putnam / Melissa Tortorella4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesStephanie Houston vs Kimberly Williams6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJana Schweikert / Patricia Johnson vs Keena Hutcheson / Dee Kelleher7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-09vs A18 3.5W TP2 LutzLost 23
L#1 DoublesVivette Saccone / Michelle Ross vs Erin Baginski / Gail Wilkes1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Peel vs Brooke Kaylor7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSharon Robinson / Marlene Pisanelli vs Lisa Lutz / Mary Lyons6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCindy Gamby vs Amanda Petit6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Tremmel / Susan Adkins vs Amanda Durbin / Kristi Schulte3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-02vs A18 3.5W AS WimerWon 50
W#1 DoublesVivette Saccone / Susan Adkins vs Kathy Stitzlein / Kathryn Wiggam3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCindy Gamby vs Holly Ballard6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Johnson / Ashley Bullach vs Larisa Fiorita / Anne Sturbaum7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesStephanie Houston vs Stephanie Noble6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Tremmel / Sharon Robinson vs Melinda Thomas / Allison Kesner6-0, 6-1
2022-05-26vs A18 3.5W BR LaveryWon 41
W#1 DoublesVivette Saccone / Michelle Ross vs Kristin Zalenski / Christine Altman6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCindy Gamby vs Allison Chiofolo6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharon Robinson / Susan Adkins vs Sally Lavery / Traci Tsai6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDonna Tremmel vs Molly Wachter1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTara Bowers / Jana Schweikert vs Abigail Altman / Kelly Sweeney6-1, 6-1
2022-05-12vs A18 3.5W NC McHolmLost 23
L#1 DoublesStephanie Houston / Vivette Saccone vs Jane Putnam / Kay McHolm6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Peel vs Jaimie Crumbley2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Ross / Sharon Robinson vs Dee Kelleher / Michelle Rich6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCindy Gamby vs Sharon Bagnolo6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Adkins / Donna Tremmel vs Rosemary O'Hara / Heather Bundschuh3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings33 teams · NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 3.5W A NR1 Kneiss91401031322
2A18 3.5W SP Gray91371333359
3A18 3.5W B WE2 Ayyappan91361438393
4A18 3.5W LT Galehouse82371336324
5A18 3.5W B WCC Moritz82371336384
6A18 3.5W CRC Downing82292152436
7A18 3.5W TP2 Lutz71291131296
8A18 3.5W CV2 Olson73341639410
9A18 3.5W A MV1 Kirchick73272352420
10A18 3.5W A WR3 Roberts73282253429
11A18 3.5W B PW1 Cicero73292155456
12A18 3.5W NC McHolm62241640343
13A18 3.5W CSC Goldberg64321843385
14A18 3.5W B MV2 Robson64292148396
15A18 3.5W WR1 Davis55272350438
16A18 3.5W B PW3 Rummel55272351409
17A18 3.5W PM Leohr55272352406
18A18 3.5W A PW2 Reid55232761446
19A18 3.5W A MM Symanski55212964467
20A18 3.5W PCC Innes55193172504
21A18 3.5W GR Tremmel44261431280
22A18 3.5W A CV1 Brubaker46262455438
23A18 3.5W CC Geduldig46252556445
24A18 3.5W B MV3 Smith37242659453
25A18 3.5W TP1 Galehouse37212963460
26A18 3.5W B KI Scovil37173374518
27A18 3.5W AS Wimer2683266430
28A18 3.5W BR Lavery17132759418
29A18 3.5W A WE1 Allan19133776528
30A18 3.5W B NR2 Shawver19133780550
31A18 3.5W A FRR McBride010104082536
32A18 3.5W FA Manera01094187560
33A18 3.5W WR2 Ferris01034795586

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Cindy Gamby
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 4
3.51
Stephanie Houston
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Ashley Bullach
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Patricia Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.26
Tara Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Emily Peel
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.21
Vivette Saccone
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.18
Susan Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Marlene Pisanelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Jana Schweikert
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Donna Tremmel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Michelle Ross
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Sharon Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Adkins + Sharon Robinson3450% games+13.3% vs expected
Jana Schweikert + Patricia Johnson3361% games+12.5% vs expected
Jana Schweikert + Ashley Bullach5456% games+6.6% vs expected
Stephanie Houston + Ashley Bullach7555% games+5.2% vs expected
Michelle Ross + Jana Schweikert8359% games+3.8% vs expected
Susan Adkins + Vivette Saccone141154% games+2.9% vs expected
Stephanie Houston + Patricia Johnson10952% games+2.0% vs expected
Susan Adkins + Tara Bowers141253% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Gamby
102W–25L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Stephanie Houston
79W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Ashley Bullach
134W–88L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Patricia Johnson
75W–56L career · 8 lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Tara Bowers
65W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Emily Peel
3W–8L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vivette Saccone
95W–76L career · 13 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Susan Adkins
88W–87L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Marlene Pisanelli
75W–99L career · 2 lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.83
Jana Schweikert
91W–98L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Donna Tremmel
14W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Ross
35W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Robinson
45W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.