Teams

2 Raintree Middle Aged Warriors

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-02vs 8 MTC Stephens ResurgenceLost 01
L#2 DoublesHamid Mahmood / Edward Yesbeck vs Greg Deeb / Donald Love3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-24vs 7 Westwood Nilson Icy-HotzWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Lee Brooks vs Jackson Dyer / Robert Nilson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-11vs 1 ACAC HollomonLost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Dowdy / Edward Yesbeck vs Loc Pfeiffer / William Crowe7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-10vs 5 Woodlake MossLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Matthew Earle vs Geoffrey Stoltz / James Kroos1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Lee Brooks
published
3.97
Tejas Raval
published
3.88
Eddie Parker
published 4
3.85
ED Fuhr
published 4
3.82
Geoff Campbell
published 4
3.79
Hamid Mahmood
published 4
3.78
Cory Connell
published 4
3.77
Mahesh Sukumaran
published
3.77
Ram Raghavan
published
3.68
Matthew Earle
published
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Joe Lacroix
published
3.49
Rufus Phillips
published
3.47
Madhav Kidambi
published
3.30
Stuart Dowdy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Brooks + Geoff Campbell6258% games−1.2% vs expected
Eddie Parker + ED Fuhr5158% games−4.6% vs expected
Ram Raghavan + Mahesh Sukumaran303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Brooks
29W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
Tejas Raval
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Eddie Parker
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
ED Fuhr
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Geoff Campbell
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Hamid Mahmood
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Cory Connell
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
Mahesh Sukumaran
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Ram Raghavan
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Joe Lacroix
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
Rufus Phillips
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Madhav Kidambi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
Stuart Dowdy
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.