Teams

5.PW.Reinicker

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-11vs 1.APEX.CaiWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelinda Reinicker / Kristen Kruszewski vs Tammy Hood / Audrey Hollett6-3, 6-2
2022-05-01vs 2.APEX.YangWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Haverstick / Terri Levine vs Emily Yang / Sarah Ellis4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-10vs 6.TOC.AroraWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelinda Reinicker / Erin Horne vs Sneha Patil / Mahek Thakkar6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLindsay Rigney / Stephanie Pucci vs Robin Rhaney / Johanna le Strat7-5, 6-1
2022-04-04vs 4.MD.BernackiWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Horne / Alexandria Berengut vs Shelley Dawson / Kathleen Knox6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsay Rigney / Stephanie Pucci vs Nancy Boorom / Laura Cerami-Haidri6-1, 6-2
2022-03-27vs 1.APEX.CaiWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelinda Reinicker / Terri Levine vs Audrey Hollett / Kay Jackson6-3, 6-3
2022-03-06vs 2.APEX.YangWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristin Comer / Melinda Reinicker vs Emily Yang / Jessenia Delos Santos3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesErin Horne vs Sarah Ellis6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTerri Levine / Emily Haverstick vs Lissy Wood / Jessica Brehmer6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Melinda Reinicker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Emily Haverstick
published 3
2.71
Erin Horne
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.69
Kristin Comer
published
2.65
Stephanie Pucci
published
2.62
Abigail Kinchen
published 3
2.51
2.45
Sarah O'Grady
published
2.40
Terri Levine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Lindsay Rigney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kristen Kruszewski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Levine + Melinda Reinicker5071% gamesnot enough data
Terri Levine + Lindsay Rigney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melinda Reinicker
98W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Emily Haverstick
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Erin Horne
55W–52L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Kristin Comer
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Stephanie Pucci
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Abigail Kinchen
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Alexandria Berengut
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Sarah O'Grady
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
2.5
Terri Levine
75W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Lindsay Rigney
26W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
Kristen Kruszewski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.