Teams

McGhee

2026 Roanoke Adult 55 & Over · Roanoke Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-05vs 8.0 JonesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Brisley / Elizabeth Feldmann vs Jennifer Baldwin / Lillian King6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie McMichael / Darlene Kennedy vs Dawn Fraser / Anne Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Wellington / Nancy Wilkinson vs Tammy Crotty / Young Ju2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-05vs 8.0 JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesShari Coolbaugh / Lynn Martin vs Lynne Krulich / Dawn Fraser3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSylvia Dill / Lynn West vs Jennifer Baldwin / Lois Harris4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten McGhee / Mary Wellington vs Young Ju / Tammy Crotty7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-03vs KniselySplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Bradshaw Hamilton / Lynn West vs Nancy Duffy / Kim Murray3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Bandy / Tracey Foutz vs Leslie Craighead / Margaret Mulcahy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-29vs 8.0 JonesWon 20
W#1 DoublesDarlene Kennedy / Kirsten McGhee vs Lois Harris / Lynne Krulich6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Fitch / Nancy Wilkinson vs Marie Earnhardt / Anne Jones6-4, 6-3
2026-07-27vs KniselyWon 30
W#1 DoublesShari Coolbaugh / Tracy Bradshaw Hamilton vs Karen Bernardy / Margaret Mulcahy4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Bandy / Amy Brisley vs Mary Hastings / Diana Osborne6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Fitch / Nancy Wilkinson vs Leslie Craighead / Kim Murray6-2, 6-1
2026-07-22vs KniselyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobin Bandy / Darlene Kennedy vs Kailani Memmer / Diana Osborne7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Feldmann / Julie McMichael vs Kim Murray / Nancy Duffy6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTracey Foutz / Kirsten McGhee vs Leslie Craighead / Cori Holderman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-29vs 8.0 JonesLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Brisley / Elizabeth Feldmann vs Young Ju / Tammy Crotty6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKirsten McGhee / Darlene Kennedy vs Lois Harris / Lillian King6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Wilkinson / Julie McMichael vs Anne Jones / Jennifer Baldwin6-7, 1-6
2026-06-22vs KniselyWon 21
W#1 DoublesShari Coolbaugh / Lynn West vs Mary Hastings / Leslie Craighead6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Bradshaw Hamilton / Mary Wellington vs Nancy Duffy / Cori Holderman6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSylvia Dill / Tracey Foutz vs Kailani Memmer / Diana Osborne5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Roanoke Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
18.0 Jones6217718186
2McGhee6215923186
3Knisely0842042275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Darlene Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Elizabeth Feldmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Carol Fitch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Julie McMichael
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Kirsten McGhee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Lynn West
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Amy Brisley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Lynn Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Shari Coolbaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Robin Bandy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Tracy Bradshaw Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Tracey Foutz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Kathleen Oddo
published
Mary Wellington
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sylvia Dill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Fitch + Kirsten McGhee5256% games+9.6% vs expected
Tracey Foutz + Robin Bandy1441% gamesnot enough data
Darlene Kennedy + Kirsten McGhee404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Wellington + Tracy Bradshaw Hamilton123 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Martin + Shari Coolbaugh033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Kennedy
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Elizabeth Feldmann
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Carol Fitch
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Julie McMichael
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
Kirsten McGhee
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Lynn West
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Amy Brisley
60W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lynn Martin
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Shari Coolbaugh
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Robin Bandy
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Tracy Bradshaw Hamilton
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Tracey Foutz
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Kathleen Oddo
15W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Mary Wellington
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sylvia Dill
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.