Teams

C4 Southampton Brown

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-05vs C3 Raintree StahlingLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Dortch / Alice Ulrichs vs Mona Stahling / Bridget Westhoven6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-24vs C7 Hermitage HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Stafford / Alice Ulrichs vs Virginia Berents / Heidi Hall6-2, 7-5
2021-04-18vs C2 MAC GreenspoonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Beth Stafford vs Mary Scott / Deirdre Vaughan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-17vs C5 Dominion HarperLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Stafford / Alice Ulrichs vs Annmarie Lobred / Lauren Duke4-6, 5-7
2021-04-03vs C1 ACAC StephensWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Beth Stafford vs Jennifer Cubitt / Hilary Brodsky6-7, 5-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Deena Kretzer
published 3.5
3.26
Alice Ulrichs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Windy Campbell
published
3.22
Alice McCollum
published 3.5
3.17
Beth Stafford
published 3.5
3.10
Patricia Loyde
published
3.10
Cheryl Woodward
published 3.5
3.08
Margaret Duke
published
3.01
Jennifer Dortch
published
2.80
Heather Scott
published 3
Nancy Steed
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deena Kretzer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alice Ulrichs
86W–77L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Windy Campbell
5W–17L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alice McCollum
23W–22L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Beth Stafford
17W–11L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Patricia Loyde
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Woodward
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Margaret Duke
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Dortch
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Heather Scott
24W–37L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Nancy Steed
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.