Teams

Camargo Red

2025 OH OV SUMMER Day A18&O W Cincinnati · 2025 Summer Day A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Cincinnati

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-10vs Camargo WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Grote / Abby Allen vs Hiromi Mizuguchi / Lisa Tatano6-4, 4-6, 1-4
2025-06-26vs Camargo WhiteLost 02
L#1 DoublesAbby Allen / Keri Malafa vs Virginia Dorn / Susan Kraemer6-4, 3-6, 3-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Cozzi / Gina Lee vs Kim Carroll / Gigi Bachey2-6, 6-7
2025-06-19vs Camargo WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Lee / Abby Allen vs Gigi Bachey / Kim Carroll7-6, 6-2
2025-06-12vs Camargo WhiteLost 12
W#1 DoublesAdele Walkiewicz / Lauren Grote vs Hiromi Mizuguchi / Ayano Shoda1-6, 7-6, 3-1
L#1 SinglesAbby Allen vs Kim Carroll6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Shteiwi / Dina Wilder vs Gigi Bachey / Susan Kraemer1-6, 3-6
2025-06-05vs Camargo WhiteSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAbby Allen / Betsy Leonidas vs Gigi Bachey / Kim Carroll6-3, 3-6, 5-2
L#2 DoublesBlake Thompson / Keri Malafa vs Hiromi Mizuguchi / Ayano Shoda4-6, 1-6
2025-05-29vs Camargo WhiteLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Shteiwi / Abby Allen vs Hiromi Mizuguchi / Ayano Shoda3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Cozzi / Keri Malafa vs Kim Carroll / Gigi Bachey6-2, 1-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Summer Day A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Adele Walkiewicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Abby Allen
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Amy Cozzi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Betsy Leonidas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Blake Thompson
published 3.5
Dina Wilder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Keri Malafa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Grote
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Shteiwi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Grote + Adele Walkiewicz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adele Walkiewicz
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Abby Allen
2W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amy Cozzi
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Leonidas
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Blake Thompson
no matches on record · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dina Wilder
9W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Keri Malafa
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Grote
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Shteiwi
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.