Teams

Witte/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-20vs Carkeet/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesMartha Carter / Rachel Montague vs Kathy Ferrara / Kim Badger7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Weaver / Callie Wesson vs Suzanne Lomax / Whitney Greer6-2, 6-4
2024-11-13vs Avant/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Irvine / Chancey Thompson vs Alexandra Morin / Brittany Glisson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKeli Brand vs Lindsey Myers6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Wilkes Yonchak / Callie Wesson vs Sarah Gallagher / Ashley Powers6-1, 6-3
2024-11-06vs Smith/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnna Witte / Chancey Thompson vs Anna Durante / Melissa Fleenor6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Montague / Caitlin Motte vs Angela Wood / Niki Shaheen3-6, 3-6
2024-10-23vs Steinhausler/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Carter / Chancey Thompson vs Tamara Steinhausler / Lyndsay Gronostaj4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Montague / Callie Wesson vs Kayleigh Turner / Meredith Philips2-6, 4-6
2024-10-16vs Sudduth/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Irvine / Keli Brand vs Mary Marshall Fenton / Kaci Turner6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaura Weaver / Rachel Montague vs Sarah Reed / Janie Beanblossom6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-02vs Galdieri/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Irvine / Mary Wilkes Yonchak vs Diana Galdieri / Carolyn Labonia4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKeli Brand vs Liza Easley6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTaylor Pickering / Caitlin Motte vs Courtney Still / Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Keli Brand
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Rachel Montague
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.65
Chancey Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.45
Martha Carter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Anne von Lanken
published 2.5
2.24
Mary Wilkes Yonchak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.99
Caitlin Motte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Callie Wesson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Montague + Martha Carter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keli Brand
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Rachel Montague
19W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Chancey Thompson
22W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Martha Carter
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Anne von Lanken
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Mary Wilkes Yonchak
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Caitlin Motte
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Callie Wesson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Pickering
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.