Teams

Vaughn/18/8.5/CWN/XU

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 8.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 7 7:00 PM
vs N/A
Aimee Vaughn
Sep 14 7:00 PM
Green Acres Country Club
Sep 21 7:00 PM
Xavier University Tennis Courts
Sep 28 7:00 PM
vs N/A
Aimee Vaughn
Oct 6 7:00 PM
Xavier University Tennis Courts
Oct 12 7:00 PM
Xavier University Tennis Courts
Oct 19 7:00 PM
vs N/A
Aimee Vaughn
2026-09-01vs trieu/Kang/18/8.5/CWN/XUWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaire Karas / Amanda Seale vs Jaesoon Han / Angela Avila6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCheryl Naruse / Ryan Barham vs Diane Trieu / Zoe Tran2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRodnelle Hadley / Riley Kennedy vs Connie Trieu / Hannah Schmucker7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Austin/18/8.5/CWN/GACC000000
2trieu/Kang/18/8.5/CWN/XU000000
3Vaughn/18/8.5/CWN/XU000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Dixon
published 4.5
4.23
Claire Karas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Aimee Vaughn
published 4
3.97
Amanda Seale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Lauren Tafaro
published
3.92
Barbora Favret
published 4
3.92
Ryan Barham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Riley Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Cheryl Naruse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Tafaro + Amanda Seale22860% games+9.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alice Dixon
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Claire Karas
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Aimee Vaughn
39W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Amanda Seale
52W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Lauren Tafaro
83W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Barbora Favret
30W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Ryan Barham
25W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Riley Kennedy
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Cheryl Naruse
7W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.