Teams

Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 17 7:30 PM
vs
Pinetop Tennis Club
Sep 24 6:00 PM
vs
Pinetop Tennis Club
Oct 1 6:00 PM
vs
Pinetop Tennis Club
Oct 8 6:00 PM
vs
J Spencer Love Tennis Center
2026-09-03vs Russo 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Baker / Kim Hunt vs Libby Strickland / Molly Norris5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Bettinger / Elisabeth Kraska vs Melissa Doupe / Jeanie Reynolds6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Jacqueline Herron vs Jen Berlin / Emmy Biaggi6-4, 6-1
2026-08-27vs Goy 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Bettinger / Elisabeth Kraska vs Kristin Williamson / Emily Mack1-6, 2-2
L#2 Doublessilvina piotti / Lynda Guarnieri vs Kelly Gekas / Courtney Jones4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Natalie Harris vs Yukari Matsuoka / Mary Batts6-2, 6-2
L#1 Doublessilvina piotti / Melissa Baker vs Carter Juergens / London Kern7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Deirdre Hjelt vs Kari Eddington / Elia Mavronikolas6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Kathryn Michaud vs Tammy Tao / Deb Budler6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-08-13vs Dean 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Herron / Amy Gilbert vs Cheryl Scott / Jill Perez1-6, 3-6
W#2 Doublessilvina piotti / Lori Harrington vs Susan Roach / Marian Hogan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie McMichael / Elisabeth Kraska vs Lisa Baker / Christine Hinch6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.5 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Goy 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM2051442
2Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM2154989
3Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021222
4Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021433
5Dean 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1142548
6Easley 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1133863
7Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM1124847
8Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM1133960
9Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM12451177
10Russo 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM0224853
11Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM02151162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Leigh Abraham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.78
Julie McMichael
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Stephanie Bettinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Lynda Guarnieri
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Lori Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
silvina piotti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Amy Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Natalie Harris
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
Jacqueline Herron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Melissa Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Elisabeth Kraska
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.38
Kathryn Michaud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Harrington + Lynda Guarnieri6070% games+5.6% vs expected
Melissa Baker + Lori Harrington4353% games+3.2% vs expected
Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+2.8% vs expected
Elisabeth Kraska + Lynda Guarnieri314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Abraham
30W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Julie McMichael
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
Stephanie Bettinger
26W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Lynda Guarnieri
54W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Lori Harrington
47W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.59
silvina piotti
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Amy Gilbert
1W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.55
Natalie Harris
48W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Jacqueline Herron
36W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Melissa Baker
37W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.