Teams

Polk - Country Club of WH/Larisey

2021 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-06vs Brakefield - Winter HavenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlisa Wolfe / Kelly Foote vs Elisa Buffington / Gretchen Wood6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarol Gardner / Sonia Herring vs Melissa Ellis / Debra Coffman4-6, 2-6
2021-04-29vs Brakefield - Winter HavenWon 20
W#1 SinglesSonia Herring vs Shannon Deck7-5, 3-3
W#2 DoublesTamara Rothstein / Kim Knapp vs Elisa Buffington / Tina Elortegui6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-22vs Brakefield - Winter HavenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTamara Rothstein / Sonia Herring vs Denise Saltman / Alexis Kelson6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesCarol Gardner vs Shannon Deck3-6, 1-6
2021-04-15vs Brakefield - Winter HavenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Henderson / Kelly Foote vs Elisa Buffington / Tina Elortegui6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCarol Gardner vs Maechi Ayoola0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-08vs Brakefield - Winter HavenLost 03
L#1 SinglesSonia Herring vs Maechi Ayoola6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTamara Rothstein / Kelly Foote vs Alexis Kelson / Debra Coffman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCarol Gardner vs Daniela Schick4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-01vs Brakefield - Winter HavenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSonia Herring vs Maechi Ayoola2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Larisey / Carol Gardner vs Alexis Kelson / Denise Saltman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Alisa Wolfe
published 4.5
4.06
Jamie Alamia
published 4.5
3.76
Carol Gardner
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Debbie Vazquez
published 4
3.73
Sonia Herring
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Tamara Rothstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Angela Larisey
published 4
3.53
Kim Knapp
published
Kelly Foote
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Herring + Tamara Rothstein262251% games−0.5% vs expected
Kelly Foote + Tamara Rothstein2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alisa Wolfe
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Jamie Alamia
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Carol Gardner
98W–114L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Debbie Vazquez
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Sonia Herring
70W–55L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Tamara Rothstein
49W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Angela Larisey
17W–12L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
Kim Knapp
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kelly Foote
49W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.