Teams

SD 3.5 Pacific Beach/ Levine

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-21vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ PonceLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Brennan / Pam Trent vs Sara Fairbank / Lilyan Ruiz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVictoria Pearce / Betsy Witt vs Irene Roberts / Maria Corbitt4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPam Trent / Patricia Brennan vs Tori Penick / Jacinthe Pare4-6, 3-6
2024-11-07vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon & GarveyLost 01
L#1 DoublesPam Trent / Patricia Brennan vs Mary Garvey / Naomi Gallego4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-24vs SD 3.5 PTC/ WoodWon 10
W#3 DoublesYuka Ishikawa / Betsy Witt vs Meg Hagan / Shelly Patriquin7-6, 6-2
2024-10-10vs SD 3.5 LJTC/ BrunoWon 10
W#1 DoublesPam Trent / Patricia Brennan vs Jessica Shehab / Sherrie Black2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-26vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Brennan / Pam Trent vs Kate Gill / Kelly Ann Tran6-3, 6-3
2024-09-19vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ IxtlahuacSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslie Sauer / Betsy Witt vs Lisa Shirley / Herta Ixtlahuac4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPam Trent / Patricia Brennan vs Cynthia Hensersky / Sylvia Devoe6-2, 6-4
2024-09-12vs SD 3.5 CTC/ WestLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Trent / Patricia Brennan vs Jessica Cunningham / Yvonne Hwang1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesYuka Ishikawa / Betsy Witt vs Ruth York / Frida Kalach7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Patricia Brennan
published
3.39
Leslie Sauer
published
3.38
Victoria Pearce
published
3.31
Kathleen Bouhdary
published
3.29
Yuka Ishikawa
published
3.28
Alejandra Serrano
published 3.5
3.25
ALEXIS MCCANDLESS
published 3.5
3.24
Pam Trent
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Betsy Witt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Ciara Levine
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Trent + Patricia Brennan3249% games−5.7% vs expected
ALEXIS MCCANDLESS + Ciara Levine3252% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Bouhdary + Yuka Ishikawa213 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Sauer + Betsy Witt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Brennan
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Leslie Sauer
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Victoria Pearce
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kathleen Bouhdary
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Yuka Ishikawa
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alejandra Serrano
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
ALEXIS MCCANDLESS
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Pam Trent
53W–65L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Betsy Witt
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Ciara Levine
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.