Teams

Amelon & Anderson: HTRC

2025 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-19vs Heffernan & Betts: HTRCWon 41
L#1 DoublesChristine Amelon / Erin McKay vs Sarah Hinkhouse / Tricia Miller7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAna Michelsen vs Ally Olson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTrisha Welter / Hillary Johnson-Jahangir vs Cynthia McCann / Amy Chatham6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCindy Klebe vs Catherine Bradley6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Bush / Michelle Novak vs Karen Koch / Rika Moore6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-18vs Heffernan & Betts: HTRCLost 23
W#1 DoublesCindy Klebe / Laura Anderson vs Cynthia McCann / Jessica Malott6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAna Michelsen vs Sarah Hinkhouse1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMary Neumann / Christine Amelon vs Karen Koch / Tricia Miller6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTracey Kramer vs Ana Lira2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRobin Sueppel / Michelle Novak vs Catherine Bradley / Ana Llopart2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Ana Michelsen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.82
Bethany Koch
published 4
3.82
Trisha Welter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Cindy Klebe
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Erin McKay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Laura Wolf
published
3.64
Christine Amelon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Christine Bush
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Teresa Suchomel
published
3.48
Tracey Kramer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Michelle Novak
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Hillary Johnson-Jahangir
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Robin Sueppel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Haedt
published
Mary Neumann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Schumacher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bethany Koch + Laura Wolf4254% games+4.3% vs expected
Michelle Novak + Hillary Johnson-Jahangir1641% games+3.7% vs expected
Christine Bush + Laura Wolf4259% games−4.8% vs expected
Jane Haedt + Erin McKay5352% games−6.1% vs expected
Christine Amelon + Bethany Koch8653% games−6.4% vs expected
Christine Amelon + Trisha Welter224 matchesnot enough data
Robin Sueppel + Hillary Johnson-Jahangir224 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Suchomel + Christine Bush314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Michelsen
37W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Bethany Koch
25W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Trisha Welter
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cindy Klebe
31W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Erin McKay
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Laura Wolf
18W–22L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Christine Amelon
34W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Christine Bush
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Teresa Suchomel
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Tracey Kramer
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Michelle Novak
72W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Hillary Johnson-Jahangir
36W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Robin Sueppel
25W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jane Haedt
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Neumann
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Schumacher
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.