Teams

KCronin (Piper Glen)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-27vs PSweeney (Firethorne CC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCindy Rhoten vs Renu Renu Gill6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKatie Bissett vs Sue Ann Lang6-3, 6-1
2024-07-21vs ESuppa (PCC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesJoanne Joliet vs Mary Kirby4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-10vs KDay (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJenny Wilken vs Angie Mehrizi6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKatie Bissett vs Lisa Bottle6-1, 6-1
2024-06-22vs TInga (Life Time)Split 11
L#2 SinglesJoanne Joliet vs Tania Inga6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKatie Bissett vs Jasmine Fontaine6-3, 6-3
2024-06-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Eades vs Paula Abrams6-0, 6-1
2024-06-12vs BBaker (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCindy Rhoten vs Allison Purmort6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAmy Eades vs Spencer Stoakley6-0, 6-1
2024-06-11vs PSweeney (Firethorne CC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCindy Rhoten vs Caroline Lattanzi5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJenny Wilken vs Wendy Hall6-2, 6-1
2024-05-29vs ESuppa (PCC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Eades vs Carla Ackels6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJoanne Joliet vs Mary Kirby6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Amy Eades
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Cindy Rhoten
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Jenny Wilken
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Katie Bissett
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.87
Katie Cronin
published
2.86
Joanne Joliet
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Maria Leahy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Joliet + Cindy Rhoten4453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Eades
45W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Rhoten
91W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Jenny Wilken
74W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Katie Bissett
67W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Katie Cronin
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Joanne Joliet
136W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Amy DeLaat Marbury
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Maria Leahy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.