Teams

OC NBTC - Orange Crush - JR

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Heather Rezner
published 3.5
3.40
Larah Telesco
published
3.39
Jennifer Whitehead
published
3.25
Kimberly Gambol
published
3.25
Nancee Weingarden
published
3.24
Joy Davis
published
3.22
Elaiza Capan
published 3.5
3.00
Raquel Schell
published
2.88
Carrie Clark
published 3
Christine Knowland
published
Julie Hollander
published
Kim Mishow
published
Leta Blakeslee
published
Maria Kelley
published
Martha Deters
published
Melissa McLeod
published
Nonette Swart
published
Pam Reyna
published
Pamela Fitzgibbon
published
Sandy Danz
published
Shandon Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shandon Smith + Kimberly Gambol2347% games+2.6% vs expected
Kimberly Gambol + Larah Telesco314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Rezner
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.61
Larah Telesco
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jennifer Whitehead
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kimberly Gambol
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Nancee Weingarden
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.25
Joy Davis
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Elaiza Capan
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Raquel Schell
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Carrie Clark
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Chantal Trillwood
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Christine Knowland
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Hollander
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Mishow
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leigh Donaldson Carman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leta Blakeslee
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Kelley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martha Deters
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa McLeod
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nonette Swart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Reyna
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Fitzgibbon
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Danz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shandon Smith
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.