Teams

Dellinger/CCC/Foothills

2026 Foothills Combo Doubles - 18 & over · 6.5 Combo Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Deer Valley Racquet Club
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Catawba Country Club
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Catawba Country Club
Sep 29 6:30 PM
Catawba Country Club
Oct 6 6:30 PM
Hickory City Park
Oct 13 6:30 PM
Lake Hickory Country Club
2026-09-02vs Geyer/Thompson/LHCC/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChad Parris / Kevin Lickman vs Freddie White / Charlie Zagaroli7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJonathan Yount / Robert Womack vs Jason Harris / Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr2-6, 4-6
2026-08-25vs Howard/HCP/FoothillsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Eckard / Trent Jolley vs Michael Elmore / Tim Wood2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Womack / Jonathan Yount vs Adam Hansen / Duncan McMillan4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRamsey Dellinger / Mike Walker vs Clay Dennis / Todd Thompson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-18vs Parry/DV/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRamsey Dellinger / Trent Jolley vs Brad Morgan / Jayjit Roy6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Eckard / Jonathan Yount vs Mitch Parry / Alex Moore4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 Combo Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Parry/DV/Foothills1021216
2Geyer/Thompson/LHCC/Foothills1021332
3Howard/HCP/Foothills0112430
4Dellinger/CCC/Foothills0112532

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jonathan Yount
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Ramsey Dellinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Mark Eckard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Kip Place
published 3.5
3.21
Robert Womack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Kevin Lickman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Trent Jolley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Eckard + Ramsey Dellinger3647% games−10.7% vs expected
Mark Eckard + Kip Place303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Yount
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Ramsey Dellinger
63W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Mark Eckard
48W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kip Place
22W–52L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Robert Womack
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kevin Lickman
73W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Trent Jolley
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.