Teams

PRC:Pinewoods Pioneers:Mannier/

2025 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women 1

13 players · average NTRP 2.69 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Hill / Susan Saccardi vs Linnea Liljedahl / Julie Puzzo3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Hellerer vs Amy Zemel6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonna Winn / Virginia Coleman-Prisco vs Shelley Uthgenannt / Saba Shahid6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10vs MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Beatty / Lauren Schaff vs Loni Figura / Laura Kudernatsch1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlison Schweizer vs Cathleen Fagan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEffi Gez / Anna Godbersen vs Carlene Simpson / Emily Plocharczyk6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesSusan Saccardi / Erin Beatty vs Molly Rutledge / Meri Lee Tyler3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Mannier vs Tanya Davignon3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAlison Schweizer / Donna Winn vs Amanda Dyal / Kathleen Lesser-Trask1-6, 4-6
2025-04-27vs RH:Volley Vixens:HellyarWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Hill / Susan Saccardi vs Paola Houlihan / Cindy Antonaras6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Hellerer vs Karen Giaimo6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVirginia Coleman-Prisco / Alison Schweizer vs Jessica Mckenzie / Lori A Rossi7-6, 6-1
2025-04-06vs MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesVirginia Coleman-Prisco / Alexandra Hill vs Jennifer Mcnamara / Anne Pidano7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnna Godbersen vs Cathleen Fagan0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mannier / Susan Saccardi vs Laryssa Balaban / Claudia Larocque6-0, 6-0
2025-03-30vs RH:Volley Vixens:HellyarWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Hill / Lauren Schaff vs Rhonia Moreau / Gabby Morales4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Hellerer vs Diana Hellyar6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEffi Gez / Jennifer Mannier vs Lisa Knoll / Jessica Mckenzie6-4, 6-4
2025-03-29vs MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mannier / Lauren Schaff vs Laura Kudernatsch / Michelle Veilleux3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Hellerer vs Cathleen Fagan4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVirginia Coleman-Prisco / Effi Gez vs Laryssa Balaban / Jennifer Polsky6-1, 6-1
2025-03-23vs RH:Volley Vixens:HellyarWon 30
W#1 DoublesVirginia Coleman-Prisco / Alexandra Hill vs Lori A Rossi / Diana Hellyar6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Hellerer vs Ashley Wiknik6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mannier / Susan Saccardi vs Donna Koji / Karen Giaimo6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesSusan Saccardi / Alison Schweizer vs Michelle Andersen / Julie Puzzo2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Hellerer vs Qin Lin6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Ann Bowen / Effi Gez vs Linnea Liljedahl / Tanya Davignon4-6, 1-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFL:Simply Smashing:Liljedahl/Tyler0920717188
2PRC:Pinewoods Pioneers:Mannier/09171023211
3MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/09101737261
4RH:Volley Vixens:Hellyar0972041275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Caitlin Hellerer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Effi Gez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Alexandra Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.31
Virginia Coleman-Prisco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.27
Susan Saccardi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Jennifer Mannier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Alison Schweizer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Erin Beatty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Geraldine Ann Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Donna Winn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Shelley Mesznik
published
2.02
Lauren Schaff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.90
Anna Godbersen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Coleman-Prisco + Donna Winn224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Mannier + Susan Saccardi303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Mannier + Effi Gez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caitlin Hellerer
14W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Effi Gez
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alexandra Hill
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Virginia Coleman-Prisco
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
Susan Saccardi
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Jennifer Mannier
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Alison Schweizer
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Erin Beatty
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Geraldine Ann Bowen
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Donna Winn
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Shelley Mesznik
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Lauren Schaff
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Anna Godbersen
3W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.