Teams

Haynes, Caroline

2024 Team Singles-JXN · Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-22vs Sullivan, AshleyWon 20
W#1 SinglesStephanie Tesseneer vs Elizabeth Pettis6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBrandi Hyatt vs Amy Adcox6-1, 6-1
2024-12-17vs Moulds, KatieSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTina Fulcher vs Rena Shepherd5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCaroline King Haynes vs Janice Stevens6-7, 2-6
2024-12-15vs Turpin, LeahbethWon 21
W#1 SinglesTina Fulcher vs Jill Webb6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCaroline King Haynes vs Mary Wilsford Hodges7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMolly Blakeney vs Leahbeth Turpin6-1, 6-4
2024-11-24vs Cooper, StephanySplit 11
W#1 SinglesTina Fulcher vs Jaime van Dan6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesStephanie Tesseneer vs Ellie Boutot6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-17vs Howard, JamieWon 30
W#1 SinglesCaroline King Haynes vs Neely Morrison6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTina Fulcher vs Megan Lyon7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesStephanie Tesseneer vs Jamie Howard6-2, 6-3
2024-11-03vs Sullivan, AshleyWon 21
W#1 SinglesStephanie Tesseneer vs Elizabeth Pettis6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBrandi Hyatt vs Ashley Sullivan6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCaroline King Haynes vs Amy Adcox6-0, 6-2
2024-10-27vs Turpin, LeahbethWon 21
L#1 SinglesCaroline King Haynes vs Mary Wilsford Hodges6-7, 3-3
W#2 SinglesBonnie Wester vs Leahbeth Turpin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBrandi Hyatt vs Jennifer Tripoli6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Haynes, Caroline7016513142
2Howard, Jamie611749107
3Turpin, Leahbeth2481024188
4Sullivan, Ashley2561532212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Caroline King Haynes
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Tina Fulcher
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.04
Stephanie Tesseneer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.79
Brandi Hyatt
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Bonnie Wester
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Molly Blakeney
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Blakeney + Caroline King Haynes3354% games+3.5% vs expected
Stephanie Tesseneer + Tina Fulcher4455% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline King Haynes
24W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
Tina Fulcher
51W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Stephanie Tesseneer
28W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Brandi Hyatt
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Bonnie Wester
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Molly Blakeney
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.