Teams

Boyles

2025 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 9.0 Adult Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-23vs RobbinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNathanael Boles / Chrystal Nickol Aranda vs Rocco Testini / Kasey Heinrich6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJack Williams / Whitney Rose Farquhar vs Harrison Marsh / Jennifer Moore6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTucker Haynes / Gracelyn Anderson vs Dain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja6-3, 6-2
2025-08-23vs RobbinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNathanael Boles / Chrystal Nickol Aranda vs Rocco Testini / Kasey Heinrich6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJack Williams / Gracelyn Anderson vs Dain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoe Alvarez / Latisha McLaurin vs Carson Rodriguez / Jennifer Moore6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-23vs RobbinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathanael Boles / Latisha McLaurin vs Dain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTucker Haynes / Whitney Rose Farquhar vs Rocco Testini / Kasey Heinrich6-1, 6-2
2025-08-22vs RobbinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoe Alvarez / Whitney Rose Farquhar vs Harrison Marsh / Jennifer Moore6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTucker Haynes / Chrystal Nickol Aranda vs Dain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Jack Williams
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.32
Chrystal Nickol Aranda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Tucker Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Nathanael Boles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Gracelyn Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joe Alvarez
published
Latisha McLaurin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Whitney Rose Farquhar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathanael Boles + Chrystal Nickol Aranda303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Williams
21W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
4.46
4.5
Chrystal Nickol Aranda
11W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Tucker Haynes
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Nathanael Boles
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
Gracelyn Anderson
30W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Joe Alvarez
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Latisha McLaurin
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Whitney Rose Farquhar
9W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.