Teams

B.Kaulback Spring 40+

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs P.GugliottaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChris Henrion vs Erik Johnson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Spinak / Chad Sokol vs Mitchell Wolborsky / Darian Spell2-6, 5-7
2023-04-24vs C.Wright U-ClubWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Mark Zimmerman vs Ronald Elliott / Scott Lundy6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChad Sokol vs Tony Kattan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-17vs L.Williams 40+Split 11
W#1 SinglesChris Henrion vs Aaron Vedder6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Kevin Johnston vs Paul Brinckerhoff / Chris Cody6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs R.Duggins 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Zimmerman / Chris Henrion vs Roy Kelly / Ken Trefzger6-7, 3-6
2023-03-27vs D.HuffmanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Mark Zimmerman vs Scott Abee / Billy Hinson2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCameron Burch / Chad Sokol vs Keven Griffith / Jeff Alman4-6, 4-6
2023-03-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChris Henrion vs David Burkhardt4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-13vs M.Benecky 40 3.5MenWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Ian Campbell vs James Mellott / Mark Schueller6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBill Green / Chad Sokol vs Yung Hung Chang / David Mize6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Cameron Burch
published 3.5
3.29
Bill Green
published 3.5
3.27
Douglas Marks
published
3.15
Chris Henrion
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Mark Zimmerman
published
3.13
Brian Kaulback
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Darshan Patel
published 3.5
3.06
Chad Sokol
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
John Cleary
published
2.90
Mike Spinak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kaulback + Chad Sokol1543% gamesnot enough data
Mark Zimmerman + Bill Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cameron Burch
47W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Bill Green
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Douglas Marks
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Chris Henrion
105W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Mark Zimmerman
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Brian Kaulback
51W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Darshan Patel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Chad Sokol
36W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
John Cleary
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.04
Mike Spinak
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.