Teams

DHaake (WSRC)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-28vs JWilder (Mason Wallace)Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrad Lucas vs Nick Larsen5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-21vs DFerraro (Mason Wallace)Won 20
W#1 SinglesDana Haake vs Griffin Mann6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMadhava Kalakota vs Drew Tomsho6-2, 6-3
2025-07-14vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesDana Haake vs Brian Hegner6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDwayne Trantham vs Ron Rossi6-1, 6-1
2025-07-12vs DFerraro (Mason Wallace)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDana Haake vs Dominic Ferraro3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBrad Lucas vs Griffin Mann4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Robert Eskridge6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-07vs JWilder (Mason Wallace)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJonathan Spensieri vs Nick Larsen7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDwayne Trantham vs Tony Cardwell6-0, 6-0
2025-06-26vs JWilder (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 SinglesBrad Lucas vs Nick Larsen4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDana Haake vs Jared Wilder6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs James Probel6-0, 6-0
2025-06-23vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJonathan Spensieri vs PATRICK TIGHE6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMadhava Kalakota vs Tobi Abel6-2, 6-1
2025-06-09vs DFerraro (Mason Wallace)Split 11
L#1 SinglesMadhava Kalakota vs Griffin Mann1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDwayne Trantham vs Drew Tomsho6-1, 6-2
2025-06-02Won 10
W#3 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DFerraro (Mason Wallace)8120715161
2DHaake (WSRC)7222514136
3JWilder (Mason Wallace)1862142263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Dana Haake
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Dwayne Trantham
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Jonathan Spensieri
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Madhava Kalakota
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.82
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Brad Lucas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dwayne Trantham + Dana Haake5065% games+9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Haake
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Dwayne Trantham
26W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jonathan Spensieri
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Madhava Kalakota
24W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
70W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Brad Lucas
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.