Teams

Marco Y- L. Keely

2021 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-12-10vs Naples Reserve - FioreWon 10
W#3 DoublesGloria Anderson / Dorothea Farmer vs Vicki Cooper / Marianne Gaffney6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCorey Stranger / Kelly Heintzelman vs Lorraine Kaplan / Carole Boivin6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGloria Anderson / Dorothea Farmer vs Doris Duignan / Suzi Garon7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2020-11-17vs Treviso Bay - CapeWon 20
W#2 DoublesCorey Stranger / Kelly Heintzelman vs Deborah Paller / Terina Korda6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeggy Keigley / Jennifer Ball vs Darlene Carpenter / Kristine Bergenheim6-3, 6-2
2020-11-12vs DoubleTrouble - Cambier - TrombleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesCorey Stranger / Kelly Heintzelman vs Eileen Hung / Eileen Komanecky2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ball / Peggy Keigley vs Bonnie Dunayer / Ilene Flack6-1, 6-1
2020-11-05vs Naples Reserve - FioreWon 10
W#3 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Gloria Anderson vs Vicki Cooper / Diane Herman6-2, 6-1
2020-10-22vs Treviso Bay - CapeWon 10
W#2 DoublesCorey Stranger / Jennifer Ball vs Deborah Paller / Kristine Bergenheim5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ball / Corey Stranger vs Doris Duignan / Patricia Herther6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Connie Johnson
published 3.5
3.44
Susan Julich
published
3.18
Linda Keely
published
3.16
Corey Stranger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Gloria Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Dorothea Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.57
Carolyn Marek
published 3
Jennifer Ball
published
Maria Riccio
published
Peggy Keigley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Keigley + Dorothea Farmer8552% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Dorothea Farmer3251% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Peggy Keigley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Connie Johnson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
Susan Julich
26W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Corey Stranger
223W–172L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gloria Anderson
57W–73L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dorothea Farmer
99W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Carolyn Marek
0W–8L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jennifer Ball
19W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggy Keigley
92W–58L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.