Teams

Schneider

2022 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.86 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-03vs NewcomerLost 01
L#3 DoublesDennis Weikel / Bechir Mehmedovich vs Greg Leihy / Gary Gladden1-6, 3-6
2022-08-01vs NewcomerWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Wyche / DONALD CRAWLEY vs Jack Lavinder / Gary Gladden6-2, 6-4
2022-07-27vs BloomquistWon 20
W#2 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / John Wyche vs Charles Davis / James Murduck6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVince Sbarra / Clayton Coker vs William Bloomquist / Kenny Martin7-5, 6-4
2022-07-16vs BloomquistLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Fredman / Dennis Weikel vs Clayt Lemme / David Ponder4-6, 1-6
2022-07-11vs NewcomerLost 01
L#2 DoublesVince Sbarra / Dan Fredman vs Greg Leihy / Richard Albers4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-28vs BloomquistWon 10
W#3 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / John Wyche vs Jay Miller / James Murduck6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-25vs NewcomerLost 01
L#1 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Dan Fredman vs Steve Newcomer / Edward Dress4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Clayton Coker
published 4
3.85
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
John Wyche
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.67
Vince Sbarra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Dennis Weikel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Dan Fredman
published 4
3.25
Andrew Berlin
published 3.5
Thomas Schneider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vince Sbarra + DONALD CRAWLEY11653% gamesnot enough data
John Wyche + DONALD CRAWLEY303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clayton Coker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
473W–252L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
John Wyche
80W–59L career · 13 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Vince Sbarra
181W–167L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
4
Dan Fredman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Andrew Berlin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Thomas Schneider
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.