Teams

WRC:RTL:Lieberson/Even

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-09vs 4S:Summer Vibes:BuonoLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaura King / Karen Greenblatt vs Sally Bednar / Sarah OMalley6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaria Dempsey vs Kelly Bloom1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDara Lieberson / Lauren Rothstein vs Carven Albanese / Jane Lucas1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesClaire Hurley / Lucia Gulbransen vs Patricia Rinaldi / Lynn Broder6-1, 6-4
2026-06-24vs CP:Serves You Right: Mostofi/FoleyLost 13
L#1 DoublesShannon Roper / Laura King vs Daniela Sansone / Susanna Vikman5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTrudie Gubitz vs Caitlin Moffett7-5, 5-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Greenblatt / Lauren Rothstein vs Carrie Foley / Carolyn Comizio3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLucia Gulbransen / Anna Eliseenkova vs Charlotte Denoyer / Theresa Sim0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAlissa Wilson / Laura Slow vs Deanna Foster / Lilly Linzenich Blanco6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRita Marcocci vs Amy Ringer0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTrudie Gubitz / Laura King vs Lorraine Palumbo / Erin Polatsek6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesClaire Hurley / Maria Dempsey vs Anna Vella / Erika Miller6-1, 6-2
2026-06-14vs 4S:Summer Vibes:BuonoLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoanna Douglas / Alissa Wilson vs Flavia Lodato / Penny Schmitt3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMaria Dempsey vs Hillary Salo0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Even / Shannon Roper vs Shannon Craley / Catherine East7-6, 3-3
L#3 DoublesClaire Hurley / Anna Eliseenkova vs Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen / Leslie Moss5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKaren Greenblatt / Alissa Wilson vs Carolyn Comizio / Jennifer Golden6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesClaire Hurley vs Susanna Vikman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDara Lieberson / Trudie Gubitz vs Dana Post / Simone Ririmasse6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Slow / Maria Dempsey vs Maha Mostofi / Emily Salmore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-24vs TCT:3.5 Racquette:BuschauerLost 04
L#1 DoublesDara Lieberson / Karen Greenblatt vs Liesl Purviance / Supreeti Saikia5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Jaykus vs Isabel Moraveck4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErin Loranger / Claire Hurley vs Haidee Bolanos / Onelda Koehler5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLucia Gulbransen / Lauren Rothstein vs Emily DeGrand / Vanessa Lee Rothkopf1-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs TCT:3.5 Racquette:BuschauerWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichele Even / Karen Greenblatt vs Isabel Moraveck / Randa Trivisonno6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTrudie Gubitz vs Kendra LaBaw6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErin Loranger / Laura Slow vs ARLYNE THUNG / Onelda Koehler6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLorraine Watkins / Lauren Rothstein vs Jennifer Myatt / Sydnee Sousa7-5, 6-3
2026-04-26vs MIT:Legends of the Ball:Genser/VellaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichele Even / Alissa Wilson vs Michelle Cardello / Lorraine Palumbo6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesShannon Roper vs Lisa Cummings6-2, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Jaykus / Claire Hurley vs Gretchen Rupp / Denise Michalowski3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDara Lieberson / Anna Eliseenkova vs Selina Huber / Deanna Foster6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · 3.5 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Alissa Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Shannon Roper
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Karen Greenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Trudie Gubitz
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.25
Laura Slow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Michele Even
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Maria Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.16
Lauren Rothstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Erin Loranger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Dara Lieberson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Jaykus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.05
Claire Hurley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Lorraine Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Lucia Gulbransen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Anna Eliseenkova
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Rita Marcocci
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Loranger + Karen Greenblatt4163% games+15.8% vs expected
Michele Even + Dara Lieberson6455% games+11.8% vs expected
Karen Greenblatt + Alissa Wilson10358% games+10.0% vs expected
Lucia Gulbransen + Dara Lieberson11754% games+9.5% vs expected
Dara Lieberson + Trudie Gubitz9358% games+8.5% vs expected
Erin Loranger + Dara Lieberson101154% games+7.0% vs expected
Lucia Gulbransen + Karen Greenblatt5452% games+6.7% vs expected
Michele Even + Erin Loranger10259% games+6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alissa Wilson
131W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Shannon Roper
80W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Karen Greenblatt
64W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Trudie Gubitz
41W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Laura Slow
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Michele Even
51W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
Maria Dempsey
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Lauren Rothstein
19W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Erin Loranger
57W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dara Lieberson
103W–124L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Elizabeth Jaykus
72W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Claire Hurley
38W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Lorraine Watkins
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
Lucia Gulbransen
39W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Anna Eliseenkova
111W–125L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Rita Marcocci
4W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.