Teams

WILLOW PASS PK CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesGraciella Barco / Aileen Salamida vs Jasmine Morgan / Maddie Thomas2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCorazon Bellamy / Winnie Rock vs Kathleen Olla / Relura Horton6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLourdes Alano / Nicole Djobadze vs Tammy Fox / Alison Erhart0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGraciella Barco / Alicia Barco vs Cathy Althoff / Judy Chang6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesChristine Start / Joma Ann Raniel vs Frances Caroline Gardhouse / Mai Pham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAlicia Barco / Graciella Barco vs Michelle Dayco / Nancy Blom6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMartha Matrisian / Minh Cannon vs Frances Caroline Gardhouse / Julieta Leong6-3, 6-0
2025-10-08vs CHABOT CANYON CW7.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesSeleste Buriani / Theresa Goodwin vs Patty Nunez / Natalie Roe7-6, 6-4
2025-10-04vs PLEASANTON CW7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlicia Barco / Graciella Barco vs Hui Chen / Beth Hill6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAlicia Barco / Graciella Barco vs Margaret Harrison / Jess Sterrett5-7, 4-6
2025-09-21vs FREMONT TC CW7.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Dayco / Mayra Dominguez vs My-Hanh Nguyen / Dona Ray6-4, 6-3
2025-09-13vs BAY CLUB PL CW7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Barco / Graciella Barco vs Haili Zhuang / Anne Neckar6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Graciella Barco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Corazon Bellamy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.06
Martha Matrisian
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.94
Stephanie Yee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Yana Bazulina
published
3.80
Jennifer Do
published
3.74
Debbie Soleta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Olga Regal
published
3.65
Theresa Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Donna Vis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Michelle Dayco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Sara Bogado
published
3.45
Nicole Djobadze
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Charlotte Fisher
published 3.5
3.26
Christine Start
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.26
Alicia Barco
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Hazel Indick
published 3.5
3.21
Aileen Salamida
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
2.99
Winnie Rock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Lourdes Alano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Marie Austero
published
Miwa Yoneyama
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olga Regal + Corazon Bellamy9068% games+13.0% vs expected
Marie Austero + Winnie Rock1639% games−6.9% vs expected
Winnie Rock + Michelle Dayco303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Graciella Barco
8W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Corazon Bellamy
38W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
4.07
Martha Matrisian
19W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Stephanie Yee
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Yana Bazulina
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
Jennifer Do
26W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Debbie Soleta
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Olga Regal
28W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Theresa Goodwin
57W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Donna Vis
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Michelle Dayco
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Sara Bogado
14W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Nicole Djobadze
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Charlotte Fisher
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3
Christine Start
23W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.26
3.5
Alicia Barco
78W–66L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Hazel Indick
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Aileen Salamida
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Jennifer Valdeabella
25W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
Winnie Rock
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Lourdes Alano
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Marie Austero
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Miwa Yoneyama
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.