Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Jones)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2023 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-04-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesJoseph Chappell vs Eric Gutierrez6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Gerardo Gomez
published 3.5
Enrique Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Francisco Llera
published 3
2.71
James Houlahan
published 3
Jose Hernandez-Bravo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Joseph Chappell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Marcus Kern
published
Mauricio Cisneros
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Miguel Aguilera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Roacho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Omar Pineda
published
Robert Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Hoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roman Hernandez
published
Seth Chavez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerardo Gomez + Robert Burns8165% games+15.7% vs expected
Roman Hernandez + Omar Pineda7355% games+0.7% vs expected
Robert Hoy + Mauricio Cisneros6361% gamesnot enough data
Robert Hoy + Nicholas Roacho314 matchesnot enough data
James Houlahan + Robert Burns224 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Roacho + Enrique Cervantes224 matchesnot enough data
Mauricio Cisneros + Enrique Cervantes224 matchesnot enough data
Roman Hernandez + Nicholas Roacho213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gerardo Gomez
72W–51L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Enrique Cervantes
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Francisco Llera
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
James Houlahan
43W–37L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Jose Hernandez-Bravo
32W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Chappell
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Marcus Kern
30W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mauricio Cisneros
74W–71L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Miguel Aguilera
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Roacho
86W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Omar Pineda
50W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Burns
61W–46L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Robert Hoy
51W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Roman Hernandez
51W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Seth Chavez
35W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.