Teams

BC-SealBeachTennis/MarkMihalco

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-12vs BC-MCC/TonyRojkoLost 01
L#1 SinglesJeff Samoff vs David Chang6-7, 2-6
2021-06-05vs BC-LLW-PRC/JesseWuLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Samoff / Jason Tropp vs Jesse Wu / Anthony Santich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Mihalco / Kris Vogt vs David Oh / Junha Baek4-6, 2-6
2021-05-29vs BC-BJKTC/KazuyaKataokaWon 20
W#2 DoublesMark Mihalco / Kris Vogt vs Brian Higa / Eugene Otsuka6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJeff Samoff vs Jason Wang6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Samoff / Jason Tropp vs ARIEL RAMACULA / Jonas Jan Mercado7-6, 6-1
2021-05-15vs BC-RedondoUnion/AsamSheikhWon 10
W#2 DoublesKris Vogt / David Delgado vs Rudy Guevara / Dillon Sisson6-4, 6-3
2021-05-08vs BC-WestEnd/NigelWithamLost 01
L#2 SinglesJeff Samoff vs Hisayoshi Watanabe6-7, 4-6
2021-05-01vs BC-Kramer/BrianKebschulllWon 10
W#2 DoublesRomeo Ponteres / Kris Vogt vs Hemant Kathuria / Paul Ashcraft6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-25vs BC-ElDorado/KarlAgnesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Samoff / Romeo Ponteres vs Ralph Martin Goco / James Lucero6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-10vs BC-PVTC/SteveLiawLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Owen / Kris Vogt vs Sean Bennett / Thad Malit3-6, 2-6
2021-04-03vs BC-WestEnd/ArtWongSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Simon / Jeff Samoff vs Larry Shapiro / Sam Bustani6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMark Mihalco / Kris Vogt vs Wil Chao / Ryan Karstad0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jason Tropp
published
3.83
David Delgado
published 4
David Simon
published 4
Gaurav Mathur
published 4
3.74
Jeff Samoff
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.72
Rodger Hughes
published
3.56
Kris Vogt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Hector Huffington
published 3.5
Mark Mihalco
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Tropp
12W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
David Delgado
12W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
David Simon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gaurav Mathur
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Samoff
52W–51L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
Rodger Hughes
18W–20L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Kris Vogt
28W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Hector Huffington
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.38
Mark Mihalco
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.