Teams

CON:Pilla

2024 NH Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-01vs ALG:Galoots:MacLeodLost 01
L#1 DoublesRaj Seelam / Jeff Roberge vs Rick Depasquale / Matthew Perrin0-6, 4-6
2023-09-24vs ALG:Page:MorrowLost 03
L#1 DoublesRaj Seelam / Scott Robinson vs Alex Mezibov / Drew Barwell0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Pignatelli vs Chris Hardin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMike Soffron / Jeff Roberge vs Adam Hirshan / Bryan Playford1-6, 4-6
2023-09-16vs GB:Tanrikulu:PucciaLost 04
L#1 DoublesAdam Heard / Christopher Cummings vs Lars Sorenson / Evan Tracz2-6, 1-2
L#1 SinglesAnthony Janes vs Ryan Obermiller2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Soffron / Robert Normandin vs Thomas Griffin / JOSEPH PUCCIA2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Waldvogel / Raj Seelam vs LIANG Zhu / Paul Summermatter1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CON:Pilla000000
2ALG:Page:Morrow0823923237
3ALG:Galoots:MacLeod08191333290
4EXE:TeamExecutive:McGuire:Zalegowski08151735279
5GB:Tanrikulu:Puccia08151738297
6MTS:Goodwin:Kennedy0882453345

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Pignatelli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Christopher Cummings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Mike Soffron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Adam Heard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anthony Janes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeff Roberge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Joseph Waldvogel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Martinson
published
Raj Seelam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Normandin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Robinson + Adam Heard123 matchesnot enough data
Adam Heard + Patrick Martinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Pignatelli
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Christopher Cummings
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mike Soffron
14W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Adam Heard
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Anthony Janes
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Roberge
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Waldvogel
8W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Martinson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Raj Seelam
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Normandin
25W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Scott Robinson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.