Teams

Fall Winners /Longshore Lake - Hayes

2024 Collier Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.94 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-14vs Longshore Lake - McWatersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Scardino / James Foley vs Terry Dean / Joe Hogan3-6, 2-6
2023-11-02vs Longshore Lake - McWatersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Foley / Thomas Stefaniuk vs Timmy Martin / Josiah Crombie5-7, 1-6
2023-10-26vs Cambier - PackoWon 10
W#3 DoublesRob Fox / James Foley vs Martin Gilvarg / Bryan Miller6-3, 6-0
2023-10-19vs Cambier - HirschWon 10
W#3 DoublesRob Fox / James Foley vs Joseph Kardek / Michael Masius6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-12vs Riverstone - MarchandWon 10
W#3 DoublesRob Fox / James Foley vs Shane Lefebvre / Daniel Becker6-4, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Andy Jhanji
published 4
3.93
Fred Weinman
published 4
3.91
Thomas Stefaniuk
published
3.86
Jay Freedman
published
3.82
Dan Scardino
published 4
3.79
Gary Dellovade
published 4
3.76
James Foley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
Heath Rozin
published 4
3.58
Charles Hayes
published 4
3.31
Emeric Robert
published 3.5
Kevin Wilson
published
Mike MacEdonia
published
Robert Crews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Jhanji + Fred Weinman14361% games+4.2% vs expected
Heath Rozin + Emeric Robert044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Jhanji
26W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Fred Weinman
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.93
Thomas Stefaniuk
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Jay Freedman
92W–63L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Dan Scardino
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Gary Dellovade
82W–47L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
4
James Foley
126W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Heath Rozin
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Charles Hayes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Emeric Robert
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Kevin Wilson
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike MacEdonia
37W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Crews
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.