Teams

Bainbridge

2024 Bainbridge Southern Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-01vs Camilla/AnglinLost 01
L#2 DoublesRhonda Wells / Niki Cox vs Erica Hilliard / Anna Gray2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-30vs Camilla/AnglinLost 01
L#2 DoublesGina Bell / Niki Cox vs Joan Bassett / Kelley Corbari6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2024-06-15vs Flint River/Paige SaundersLost 02
L#1 DoublesNiki Cox / Korey Burton vs Holly Harrison / Morgan Scott1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Cooper / Vickie Morgan-Gates vs Carson Parker / Jennifer Kjellerup6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-02vs Camilla/AnglinLost 01
L#1 DoublesRhonda Wells / Niki Cox vs Joan Bassett / Kelley Corbari1-6, 1-6
2024-05-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJoan Overman / Rhonda Wells vs Gina Herring / Anna Lee3-6, 1-6
2024-05-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVickie Morgan-Gates / Leigh Cooper vs Katrina Walton / Holly Harrison4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Gina Bell
published 4
3.53
April Helms
published 4
3.43
Vickie Morgan-Gates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Susie Hartzog
published
3.38
Rhonda Wells
published
3.37
Niki Cox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Leigh Cooper
published
3.30
Joan Overman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Genia Kimmel
published 3.5
3.18
Sheryl Cannington
published
3.06
April Powell
published 3.5
2.89
Melanie Feliz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Cooper + Joan Overman4253% games+3.0% vs expected
Leigh Cooper + Niki Cox10157% games+1.0% vs expected
Sheryl Cannington + Leigh Cooper5167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gina Bell
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
April Helms
3W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Vickie Morgan-Gates
35W–70L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
Susie Hartzog
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Rhonda Wells
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Niki Cox
51W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Leigh Cooper
59W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Joan Overman
32W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Genia Kimmel
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheryl Cannington
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
April Powell
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
3.06
Melanie Feliz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.