Teams

KATEBAYLEY

2023 Winter Singles Flex League (YER) · 3.0 Women

1 player · average NTRP / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesKate Bayley vs Karen Walker6-2, 6-3
2023-05-31vs McIntyre (Flexible)Won 10
W#1 SinglesKate Bayley vs Alexa Helsell McIntyre7-5, 6-4
2023-04-20vs LIATI - DAYTIME ONLYLost 01
L#1 SinglesKate Bayley vs Heather Liati4-6, 5-4
2023-03-20vs lushashaka (Flexible)Won 10
W#1 SinglesKate Bayley vs Lusha Zhang6-4, 3-3
2023-02-14vs ReudinkLost 01
L#1 SinglesKate Bayley vs Mikhaila Reudink3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings69 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McMonigal5050024
2Subramanian (Flexible)5050015
3Struk5050124
4Forster5050231
5Young Flex4040019
6Song4040223
7Phillips (Flexible)4141129
8lushashaka (Flexible)4141130
9Rebocho4141129
10Busby Flex'23 (Flexible)4141228
11Holt (Flexible)4141217
12Poll (Flexible)4141222
13Licata (Flexible)4141220
14LIATI - DAYTIME ONLY4141341
15Schonhoff - daytime4141333
16Acer4141325
17DaiDai4141334
18Sofia Zubiria (Flexible)4141437
19Okamura (DAYTIME)4141435
20T.Leachman4141544
21IrisXin (Flexible)3131323
22Swiftney3131331
23Younis (Flexible)3232331
24KATEBAYLEY3232343
25MillerTime3232337
26Mathews (daytime)3232329
27Lamoria3232333
28Jeneancreason183232427
29Meta3232430
30Lucy GG3232442
31WATE (Flexible)3232437
32Reudink3232545
33Bauer3232540
34Counter Flex 20233232535
35Naden3232648
36Sweek2222435
37Myers Mania (Flexible)2222429
38ROBINETT DAYTIME2323541
39KSu2323537
40YKim2323636
41Sarah Popek (Flexible)2323634
42Lupinacci2323642
43Apfel (Flexible)2323749
44Mancini2323746
45ZIMMER WEEKEND FLEX2323744
46woo woo2323750
47Porter (Daytime)2323850
48Viera1313642
49Tate1313636
50Sevart (Flexible)1414649
51Stopforth (Flexible)1414847
52Blankenship (Daytime)1414848
53Vuong1414847
54MCretu (Winter2023)1414848
55ANNIK1414849
56Gass (Flexible)1414848
57McIntyre (Flexible)1414958
58BIBIREATA1414959
59Impola (Flexible)0404848
60Saelzer0404846
61CUETO0505855
62Gliner (Flexible)05051061
63Walker (Daytime)05051060
64Khan05051060
65Sheila K05051060
66Willgerodt05051060
67Sophie Fawcett05051058
68Wyer (Flexible)05051058
69Feller (Flexible)05051059

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Kate Bayley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Bayley
36W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.