Teams

Level Up

2025 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

17 players · average NTRP 2.57 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs Cottonwood Club - Special KLost 12
L#1 DoublesNeena Yoon / Kirsten Short vs Lisa Harrison / Sandra Sweetland2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKassidy Oasay / Linda Zhang vs Kathryn Tunacik / Kristine Johnson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChichi Eke-Ukoh / Shalee Jenkins vs Kristin Bretz / Crystal Connors1-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs Liberty Park-For the LoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesKassidy Oasay / Keerstin Smith vs Susan Heap / Ali Love6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Gadberry / Rachael Gilmore vs Angela Fletcher / Heather Wissler6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarina Denton / Sanjana Ramesh vs Christina Montero / Tiffany Rodriguez0-6, 1-6
2025-11-22vs Sports Mall-Team FunWon 21
L#1 DoublesKassidy Oasay / Jennifer Lopez Monsalve vs Hailey Jensen / Amanda Robinson1-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesMikelle Pouwer / Sanjana Ramesh vs Madison Milligan / Corina Nabaum6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Walters / Bri Hernandez vs Aishan Zhong / Diana Xiaowen Yang6-3, 3-4, 1-0
2025-11-15vs SL Tennis-TurnbowWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lopez Monsalve / Amy Gadberry vs Maggie Reynolds / Amanda Vaskovich6-4, 4-1
W#2 DoublesShalee Jenkins / Chichi Eke-Ukoh vs Brittney Werth / Victoria Rosdahl4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarina Denton / Heidi Loewen vs Dart Schmalz / Laura Hughes3-6, 0-6
2025-11-08vs Liberty Park-En FuegoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lopez Monsalve / Sanjana Ramesh vs Heather Gough / Marley Dominguez6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRachael Gilmore / Keerstin Smith vs Alicia Miller / Trena Anderson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Walters / Kirsten Short vs Janelle Freund / Jennie Moser1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-01vs Cottonwood Club - Special KLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachael Gilmore / Mikelle Pouwer vs Kate Hazelwood / Kristin Hutchins1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Gadberry / Bri Hernandez vs Kristine Johnson / Lisa Harrison4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Zhang / Neena Yoon vs Crystal Connors / Kristin Bretz6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Kassidy Oasay
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.75
Keerstin Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Rachael Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Amy Gadberry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Linda Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Chichi Eke-Ukoh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Heidi Loewen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Bri Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.18
Jennifer Lopez Monsalve
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Shalee Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.08
Mikelle Pouwer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.06
Neena Yoon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.00
Marina Denton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kirsten Short
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Walters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sanjana Ramesh
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kassidy Oasay + Keerstin Smith12075% games+19.0% vs expected
Neena Yoon + Linda Zhang5256% games+11.3% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Rachael Gilmore5259% games+9.4% vs expected
Rachael Gilmore + Amy Gadberry4168% games+5.3% vs expected
Neena Yoon + Marina Denton134 matchesnot enough data
Neena Yoon + Rachael Gilmore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
2.5
Kassidy Oasay
37W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.79
Keerstin Smith
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.75
Rachael Gilmore
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%14%86%
2.64
2.5
Amy Gadberry
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Linda Zhang
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Chichi Eke-Ukoh
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Heidi Loewen
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Bri Hernandez
4W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.25
2.5
Jennifer Lopez Monsalve
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Shalee Jenkins
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Mikelle Pouwer
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Neena Yoon
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Marina Denton
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Kirsten Short
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Walters
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sanjana Ramesh
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.