Teams

Fahrmeier-Young at Heart-KCC

*2025 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 NoHo Women · 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesKaren Fahrmeier / Risa Cogliandro vs Carol Davis / Donna Salmonsen2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Friend / Babette Lopez vs Carol Mazar / Lori Robertson6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesRisa Cogliandro / Babette Lopez vs Cathy Graham / Lori Robertson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Fahrmeier / Sandy Durr vs Donna Salmonsen / Dawn Brubaker5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Friend / Tami Kuykendall vs Dolores Barnhill / Carol Mazar4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBabette Lopez / Elizabeth Friend vs Cathy Graham / Lori Robertson5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTami Kuykendall / Sandy Durr vs Carol Davis / Dawn Brubaker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRisa Cogliandro / Diane Chisam vs Donna Salmonsen / Carol Mazar4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesBabette Lopez / Elizabeth Friend vs Carol Davis / Dawn Brubaker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Fahrmeier / Sandy Durr vs Cathy Graham / Lori Robertson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatty Matson / Diane Chisam vs Carol Mazar / Dolores Barnhill3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesBabette Lopez / Risa Cogliandro vs Carol Davis / Donna Salmonsen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Fahrmeier / Sandy Durr vs Dolores Barnhill / Julie Pflueger6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTami Kuykendall / Patty Matson vs Jeannie Case / Carol Mazar7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Babette Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Elizabeth Friend
published 4
3.54
Risa Cogliandro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Diane Chisam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karen Fahrmeier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Patty Matson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Durr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tami Kuykendall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Chisam + Patty Matson224 matchesnot enough data
Risa Cogliandro + Babette Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Durr + Karen Fahrmeier123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Babette Lopez
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Friend
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Risa Cogliandro
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Diane Chisam
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Karen Fahrmeier
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty Matson
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Durr
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tami Kuykendall
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.