Teams

BC-ElSegundo/SusanMoreno3.5

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · BC Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodani3.5000000
2BC-MiraCosta/ElizabethPark3.5000000
3BC-AltaVista/KarieLanterman3.5000000
4BC-SouthEnd/KathyKim3.5000000
5BC-BillieJeanKing/BeejellSoco3.5000000
6BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaport3.5000000
7BC-MCC/AmySchmargen3.5000000
8BC-MCC/KristieSherrill3.5000000
9BC-ElSegundo/SusanMoreno3.5000000
10BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini3.5000000
11BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolff3.5000000
12BC-Kramer/ColleenPost3.5000000
13BC-MCC/LesleyLyon3.5000000
14BC-Peninsula/PattiYork3.5000000
15BC-WestEnd/TakakoTary3.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Julie Bianchi
published
3.29
Erin Mand
published
3.18
Elizabeth Weaver
published
3.14
Jennifer Demoff
published
3.12
Linda Tyrer
published
3.10
Carin Laue
published 3.5
3.08
Kathleen Dohrmann
published
3.00
Corinne Gafni
published 3.5
3.00
Nadine Wong
published
2.93
Jessica Poff
published
2.93
Veronica Deutsch
published
2.79
Ivy Draughan
published
2.76
Brex-anna Stragnell
published 3.5
2.74
Susan Moreno
published
Laura Smith Terry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Demoff + Linda Tyrer5352% games+4.5% vs expected
Erin Mand + Elizabeth Weaver8648% games+0.8% vs expected
Jessica Poff + Ivy Draughan044 matchesnot enough data
Brex-anna Stragnell + Corinne Gafni033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Bianchi
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Erin Mand
22W–12L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Elizabeth Weaver
13W–13L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Jennifer Demoff
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Linda Tyrer
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carin Laue
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Kathleen Dohrmann
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Corinne Gafni
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Nadine Wong
19W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jessica Poff
2W–12L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.93
Veronica Deutsch
44W–93L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ivy Draughan
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.79
3.5
Brex-anna Stragnell
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.76
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.74
Laura Smith Terry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.