Teams

OC Coto De Caza

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-25vs OC LNRC - BarbLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolina Bowen / Jackie Guthrie vs Karyn Whitham / Nina Etedali6-7, 2-6
2022-11-15vs OC The Huntington Club - JoWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Guthrie / Melissa MacLeod vs Jacqueline Jernigan / Samantha Bloom6-4, 6-3
2022-11-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Guthrie / Carolina Bowen vs Julie Reynolds / Sheri Nerland6-3, 7-6
2022-10-27vs OC MVTC - GeeLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Guthrie / Melissa MacLeod vs Laura Schlom / Sara Wiens2-6, 5-7
2022-10-21vs OC Eldorado TC - LisaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa MacLeod / Jackie Guthrie vs Jennifer Paz / Claudia Shea6-3, 6-2
2022-10-03vs OC LLW Humble Bees - CMTC - NicoleLost 01
L#3 DoublesJackie Guthrie / Melissa MacLeod vs Elyzabeth Pham / Nicole Doan3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jackie Guthrie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
3.42
Maria Valera
published
3.33
Cathy Field
published 3.5
Gina Rindahl
published 3.5
3.21
Shelly Carroll
published
3.21
Dianna Claton
published 3
3.16
Danielle Futrell
published 3.5
3.14
Carolina Bowen
published 3.5
2.94
Alexandra Simon
published 3
Jeannette Siciliani
published
Semra Nogueira
published
Tammy Beykpour
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Field + Maria Valera224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jackie Guthrie
33W–23L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Allie Bertocchini
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Maria Valera
15W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Cathy Field
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gina Rindahl
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Carroll
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Dianna Claton
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%6%94%
3.21
3.5
Danielle Futrell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carolina Bowen
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3
Alexandra Simon
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jeannette Siciliani
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Semra Nogueira
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tammy Beykpour
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.