Teams

Johnson

2025 · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJenni Johnson / Angie Paulson vs Laura Adams / Jill Joyce3-6, 2-6
2025-09-29vs KetchamLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Morgan / Angie Paulson vs Julie Briggs / Callie Voges3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angie Paulson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Olivia Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Jenni Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.56
Rekha Geethadevi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.54
Becky Quast
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.40
Jewel Akpose
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.35
Heather Tuttle
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Morgan
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenni Johnson + Rekha Geethadevi5551% games+10.8% vs expected
Becky Quast + Heather Tuttle1646% games+5.0% vs expected
Angie Paulson + Heather Tuttle044 matchesnot enough data
Jenni Johnson + Heather Tuttle134 matchesnot enough data
Rekha Geethadevi + Heather Tuttle224 matchesnot enough data
Olivia Williams + Heather Tuttle044 matchesnot enough data
Rekha Geethadevi + Jewel Akpose123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Paulson
0W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Williams
33W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Jenni Johnson
25W–47L career · 11 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Rekha Geethadevi
18W–36L career · 10 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Becky Quast
13W–35L career · 18 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jewel Akpose
71W–78L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
35W–36L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Heather Tuttle
43W–71L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Morgan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.