Teams

Ross

Adult 18 & Over League · Adult 18 & Over 3.5M

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-02vs SwartzWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Gibbs / Drew Wallace vs Raymund Untalan / Will Lightfoot6-2, 6-1
2026-05-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCario Dickerson / Scott Gibbs vs Kent Nally / Isaiah Gonzales0-6, 4-6
2026-05-05vs NagelWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott Gibbs / Cario Dickerson vs Shane Hill / Todd Rea7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCecil Ross / Tommy LaFon vs Neil Granath / Wesley Pullig7-6, 6-4
2026-04-28vs WetzLost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Gibbs / CODY CAULEY vs Riley Hill / Brint Harmon4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-04-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesDamon Scott Cotton / Scott Gibbs vs Dave Schaller / Kenneth Perret6-3, 6-3
2026-04-07vs NallySplit 11
W#2 DoublesScott Gibbs / Cario Dickerson vs David Hockridge / Reggie Aguilar6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCecil Ross / Tommy LaFon vs Kent Nally / Jacob Halsell7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-02vs NagelLost 01
L#2 DoublesDrew Wallace / Tommy LaFon vs Neil Granath / David Wagner5-7, 2-6
2026-03-24vs WetzWon 10
W#3 DoublesCario Dickerson / Scott Gibbs vs Charles Burgoyne / Rob Houser6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mason Brooks
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.54
Scott Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.42
Tommy LaFon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Cecil Ross
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Gibbs + Tommy LaFon16165% gamesnot enough data
Scott Gibbs + Cecil Ross6554% gamesnot enough data
Tommy LaFon + Cecil Ross213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mason Brooks
35W–26L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
Scott Gibbs
84W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Tommy LaFon
42W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Cecil Ross
48W–70L career · 9 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.