Teams

Cheval Smashionistas - J. Urban

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over - Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-08vs Hills/Tonnu - HG Mixed NutsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAngela Huber / Susan Sommerfield vs Xue Chan / Thais Michael3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Sommerfield / Avarie Wasp vs Dorothy Flair / Juanita Vila6-3, 6-4
2022-02-18vs Buckhorn Aces - S. MosherWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoanne Urban / Tracy Hodapp vs Susan MOSHER / Carol Garcia6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Hayes / Tracy Hodapp vs Sarah Ayres / Wendy Dobreff4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-01vs PC Berry Ballers - J. WyckoffLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoanne Urban / Susan Sommerfield vs Debra Lowe / Gabrielle Legeay4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Hodapp / Susan Sommerfield vs Monica Castaneda / Laura Fetters7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Alex Jackson
published 3.5
Jacqueline Hayes
published 3.5
3.22
Chelsea Johns
published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Crow
published
3.00
Joanne Urban
published
2.88
Tracy Hodapp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
2.81
Angela Huber
published 3
2.71
Niki Kadakia
published
2.60
Susan Sommerfield
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Robin Perrone
published
2.56
Anjali Singh
published 3
2.50
Pam Frost
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Lindblom + Tracy Hodapp51046% games−3.1% vs expected
Susan Sommerfield + Tracy Hodapp3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Jackson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Jacqueline Hayes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Chelsea Johns
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Lisa Crow
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Joanne Urban
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Tracy Hodapp
84W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Danielle Lindblom
93W–106L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Angela Huber
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Niki Kadakia
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Susan Sommerfield
58W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Robin Perrone
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Anjali Singh
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
Pam Frost
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.