Teams

TOCC Mitchell

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 SinglesMeagan Baskin vs Robyn Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLindsey OConnell vs Sabine Pierre6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKatherine Swetman vs Jennifer Mitchell6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMeagan Baskin vs Kelly Robinson6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesShari Newman vs Sabine Pierre3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTara Mitchell vs Nicole Rivera6-1, 6-2
2024-11-26vs OSTC - MaloneWon 21
L#1 SinglesKatherine Swetman vs Carlie Saylor2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey OConnell vs Sarah Malone6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTara Mitchell vs Megan Nettles6-1, 6-1
2024-10-23vs BBTC Smith 2.5 SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesAshley Gunn vs Lynn Hebert6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesGeralyn Roussel vs Pam Berdine2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKatherine Swetman vs Dana Delvescovo2-6, 0-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Meagan Baskin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.64
Ashley Gunn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.53
Lindsey OConnell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.47
Katherine Swetman
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Tara Mitchell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.22
Shari Newman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Geralyn Roussel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Hillary Mathis
published
Sara Kennedy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Swetman + Lindsey OConnell4551% games−0.5% vs expected
Tara Mitchell + Meagan Baskin404 matchesnot enough data
Tara Mitchell + Lindsey OConnell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meagan Baskin
16W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
2.5
Ashley Gunn
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
0%16%84%
2.64
Lindsey OConnell
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%42%58%
2.53
Katherine Swetman
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%58%42%
2.47
Tara Mitchell
27W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.37
Shari Newman
5W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.22
Geralyn Roussel
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Hillary Mathis
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Kennedy
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.