Teams

Whitfield/18/4.0/M/BREC

2025 BR Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.0 BR (18&O) Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-09vs Martin/18/4.0/M/LSULost 05
L#1 DoublesDylan Robicheaux / Hunter Gilbert vs Jeff Martin / Hunter Kinchen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharles Sayger vs Thach Nguyen3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNam Nguyen / Daniel Lockwood vs Charles Walters / Eugene Nardo6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEric Gravois vs Nathan Nguyen0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesConnor Gonzales / DEREK MICHELL vs Garrett Sivils / Stephen Bienvenu1-6, 2-6
2025-03-05vs Martin/18/4.0/M/LSULost 04
L#1 DoublesWilliam Benton / Dylan Robicheaux vs Nathan Nguyen / Stephen Bienvenu2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCharles Sayger vs Sangho Yu5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJerome Skrandel / DEREK MICHELL vs Charles Walters / Martin Padial4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNam Nguyen / Daniel Lockwood vs Jeff Martin / Tyler Martin1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 BR (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charles Sayger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.61
DEREK MICHELL
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Hunter Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Daniel Lockwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
William Benton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Andrew Muhl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jerome Skrandel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Tom Eldringhoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Wilbert Whitfield
published
2.97
Connor Gonzales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Eric Gravois
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Dylan Robicheaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rafael Ruiz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Gravois + Tom Eldringhoff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Sayger
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
DEREK MICHELL
33W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Hunter Gilbert
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Daniel Lockwood
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
William Benton
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Andrew Muhl
26W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
Jerome Skrandel
25W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Tom Eldringhoff
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Wilbert Whitfield
0W–12L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
3.5
Connor Gonzales
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Eric Gravois
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Dylan Robicheaux
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rafael Ruiz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.