Teams

LA - Development Hell

2026 One Doubles - Local League Only - LA · LA - Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-21vs LA - Ladybugs - WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesSasha Silver / Lisha Brooks vs Ievgeniia Ostrovska / Jasmine Gaston6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-03-14vs LA - Ace HolesLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Emanuele / Kristina Woo vs Angelique Cabral / Lulu Liu4-6, 6-5, 1-0
2026-02-21vs LA - The RookiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesSasha Silver / Ashley Chang-warwick vs Chantam Duong / Rebecca Sene6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2026-02-14vs LA - Slice Slice BabyLost 01
L#1 DoublesSasha Silver / Kristina Woo vs Gloria Hann / Eunice Lakis1-6, 5-7
2026-02-07vs LA - Kick AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesHannah Fidell / Nicole Emanuele vs Hannah Udren / Makena White3-6, 2-6
2026-02-01vs LA - Baby Got BackhandWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisha Brooks / Kristina Woo vs Susan Troy / Judy Mclellan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-25vs LA - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisha Brooks / Sasha Silver vs Cathleen Stern / Clara Lim6-2, 6-4
2026-01-17vs LA - High StrungLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristina Woo / Nicole Emanuele vs Christine Doryon / Karine Chung3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · LA - Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - High Strung6262451
2LA - Ladybugs - Black6262668
3LA - The Tough Asks5353753
4LA - Slice Girls5353760
5LA - Mulholland Navy5353763
6LA - Kick Aces5353860
7LA - Slice Slice Baby4444862
8LA - The Rookies4444868
9LA - Ace Holes4444966
10LA - Development Hell35351281
11LA - Mulholland White35351289
12LA - Ladybugs - Red35351384
13LA - Ladybugs - White26261487
14LA - Baby Got Backhand17171485

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Daniel Kahana
published 4.5
2.29
Kristina Woo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Liz Millikin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Chang-warwick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Lisha Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Sasha Silver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Hannah Fidell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Nicole Emanuele
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Kahana
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.56
Kristina Woo
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Liz Millikin
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Ashley Chang-warwick
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisha Brooks
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sasha Silver
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Hannah Fidell
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Nicole Emanuele
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.