Teams

Tri-Taniums

2022 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-10-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Kirsten Willis vs Lee Greenlee / Jennifer Price4-6, 4-6
2022-10-08vs Sweet SpotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKirsten Willis / Laura Hungiville vs Linda Wolf / Sandy Martin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiwen Tao / Martha Cornatzer vs Gail Eberhardt / Carol Vitelli6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Kirsten Willis
published
3.30
Laura Hungiville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Burns
published 3.5
3.08
Martha Cornatzer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Noela Fries
published
2.85
Robyn Houston
published
2.73
Frances Skinner
published 3
2.68
Liwen Tao
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirsten Willis
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.90
3.5
Laura Hungiville
67W–119L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amy Burns
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
Robyn Houston
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Frances Skinner
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Christine Hueholt
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Kathleen Annichiarico
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Liwen Tao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.