Teams

De.Skiko18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-03vs Co.Shaw18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeb Skiko / Lena Gott vs Joanna Brooks / Rachel Brown4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-09-26vs An.Kinlaw18CLost 02
L#2 DoublesDeb Skiko / Amanda Bauer vs Andra Kinlaw / Danielle Stringer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCybele Brockmann / Gwen Noble vs Marissa Parrish / Heather Mittag1-6, 4-6
2023-09-12vs Na.Regan18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesCybele Brockmann / Gwen Noble vs Natalie Regan / Nancy Gugliotta2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-22vs Sh.Agresta18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Nugent / Deb Skiko vs Shannon Phillips / Lauren Triebert6-3, 6-3
2023-08-10vs Ma.Schantz18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesLena Gott / Deb Skiko vs Sarah Breazeale / Rebecca Procter6-3, 6-4
2023-08-08vs Be.Wood-Ehrenberger18CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLena Gott / Cybele Brockmann vs Brette Best / Carole Anne Hussey6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGwen Noble / Laurie Randall vs Isabelle Homes Gesher / Kimberly Monsees6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Bowler
published 4
3.58
Keri Allen
published
3.51
Deb Skiko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Cybele Brockmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Mary Jo Nugent
published
3.33
Lena Gott
published
3.32
Amanda Bauer
published 3.5
3.10
Sharon Cole
published
3.06
Sharon Lambe
published
2.98
Gwen Noble
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Laurie Randall
published
Regina Heroux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Skiko + Cybele Brockmann161948% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Bowler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Keri Allen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Deb Skiko
110W–112L career · 4 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Cybele Brockmann
82W–106L career · 3 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Mary Jo Nugent
36W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Lena Gott
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amanda Bauer
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Sharon Cole
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Sharon Lambe
21W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
Gwen Noble
106W–95L career · 5 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Laurie Randall
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Regina Heroux
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.