Teams

MEMPK ABELLO

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs GOG ENGELAGELost 13
L#1 DoublesWilliam Stone / Ronnie Schilling vs Jason Carter / Mark McDowell2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs Timothy Stacey6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLouis Jarasviroj / Dave Borden vs Craig Engelage / Patrick Sheehy4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Robinson / Phil Abello vs Doug Colvard / Chris Couch6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-09vs FHCS PASSMORELost 13
L#1 DoublesRonnie Schilling / William Stone vs Jeff Boehm / Mark Breeding3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs Mike Daniels3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLouis Jarasviroj / Greg Schochet vs Brian Priest / David Malmquist4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPhil Abello / David Robinson vs Dale Passmore / Jed Johnson7-6, 6-0
2024-07-02vs LTFCS DARKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRonnie Schilling / Dave Borden vs Brett Matheson / Joel Collins1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Stone vs Randall Bourgeois6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGreg Schochet / Louis Jarasviroj vs Cederick Dark / Trent Glaser3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPhil Abello / David Robinson vs William Fry / Neal Siegel6-2, 6-4
2024-06-25vs FLYHS LEEPERLost 13
L#1 DoublesDavid Robinson / Dave Borden vs Chase Campbell / Michael Halenkamp3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs Diogo Carvalho3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Stone / Greg Schochet vs Mike Hjelkrem / Matt Campbell4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPhil Abello / Peter Eller vs Aaron Pring / Anthony Park7-6, 6-2
2024-06-18vs CSRC GAYDOSLost 13
L#1 DoublesPeter Eller / Phil Abello vs Craig Gaydos / Zach Barker6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs Charles Autry6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Stone / Louis Jarasviroj vs Nate Hopkins / Gene Bloch4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHugo Fontalvo / David Robinson vs Charlie Cuthill / Mark Phelan5-7, 2-6
2024-06-11vs GOG ENGELAGELost 04
L#1 DoublesRonnie Schilling / Peter Eller vs Tom Bulloch / Jason Carter3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs Timothy Stacey2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLouis Jarasviroj / William Stone vs Jack Denton / Patrick Sheehy5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDave Borden / David Robinson vs Doug Colvard / Charles Ripp1-6, 4-6
2024-06-04vs FHCS PASSMORESplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Robinson / Peter Eller vs Mike Daniels / Mark Breeding3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs Jeff Boehm6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLouis Jarasviroj / William Stone vs Dale Passmore / David Malmquist6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHugo Fontalvo / Tim Townley vs Zac Gorrell / Brian Priest3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
William Stone
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.42
Gregory Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Hugo Fontalvo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Greg Schochet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Phil Abello
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Dave Borden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Louis Jarasviroj
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Eller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ronnie Schilling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Townley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Smith + Greg Schochet5356% games+1.6% vs expected
William Stone + Phil Abello3345% games−5.5% vs expected
Louis Jarasviroj + Greg Schochet3542% games−10.2% vs expected
Gregory Smith + Phil Abello4259% gamesnot enough data
Louis Jarasviroj + William Stone123 matchesnot enough data
William Stone + Gregory Smith213 matchesnot enough data
William Stone + Greg Schochet213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Stone
53W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Gregory Smith
80W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Hugo Fontalvo
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Greg Schochet
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Phil Abello
37W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Dave Borden
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Louis Jarasviroj
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Eller
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronnie Schilling
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Townley
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.